The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Cocaine cues used in experimental research: a systematic review

Cocaine cues used in experimental research: a systematic review
Cocaine cues used in experimental research: a systematic review
Aims: cue exposure therapy (CET) is a promising treatment approach for
cocaine substance use disorder (SUD). CET specifically targets the
psychological and physiological responses elicited by drug-related cues, aiming
to reduce their motivational impact. To advance understanding of CET for
cocaine treatment, this systematic review aims to categorise the range of
cocaine cues used in research.

Methods: a systematic review of the existing literature with searches conducted
on PubMed and Web of Science bibliographic databases with no time
constraints in August 2024 (PROSPERO: CRD42024554361). Three reviewers
were independently involved in the screening, review and data extraction
process, in line with PRISMA guidelines. Data extracted included participant
demographics, study design, data on the cocaine cue task, and examples (if
provided). Each study was appraised and received a quality score. The
secondary outcome was to summarise examples for each category type
identified. The data are presented as a narrative synthesis.

Results: 3,600 articles were identified and screened. 235 articles were included
in the analysis. Cues identified included images, paraphernalia, drug-related
words, cocaine smell, auditory stimuli presented via audiotapes, video
recordings, scripts, and virtual reality environments, often combining multiple
modalities. Included studies recruited cocaine-dependent individuals,
recreational users, polydrug users, and non-cocaine-using controls. The sample
sizes of the studies ranged from a single case study to a study including 1,974
participants.

Conclusions: this review found that studies employed a wide range of cue
categories, but detailed examples were often lacking, limiting replication. The
number and combination of cues varied: some studies used only cocaine-
related images, while others included images, videos, physical items, and
audiotapes. The level of immersion and personalisation also differed
considerably. All studies used cocaine-specific cues, most commonly images or
representations of cocaine substance, cocaine use or drug paraphernalia, drug
preparation items, or conversations of cocaine use and its effects. The overall
quality of the included studies was deemed good, with all adhering to standard
research norms. While this review highlights the breath of cue types used in the
literature, further research should focus on enhancing cue exposure techniques
by incorporating more immersive and personalised stimuli, and by providing
clearer documentation of cue characteristics to support replication and clinical
translation.
cue exposure therapy, cocaine, cocaine-cue reactivity, cocaine treatment, cue-induced cocaine craving, cocaine dependence, cue reactivity
2076-3425
Brobbin, Eileen
eef57fe5-b468-48ee-ad88-778b2b8a2404
Lowry, Natalie
2db16f5a-2cab-4912-b9b5-8d7b7a66be2d
Cella, Matteo
0d54b80b-d206-4dd2-801f-bc3cc232284e
Copello, Alex
329f111e-542a-47db-968b-2b674ed0851a
Coulton, Simon
1b8604f6-49a9-4818-b06f-258bc0464fed
Di Pietro, Jerome
a663901e-008b-4472-88bb-aa57054d2e08
Drummond, Colin
fb7b0f61-d908-459d-ae9a-83ce3cd37dd2
Glautier, Steven
964468b2-3ad7-40cc-b4be-e35c7dee518f
Kiyak, Ceyda
6b11d02c-b4bc-4bac-bcdb-3f94765c7da6
Phillips, Thomas
b1d4d8f2-b26e-4e89-8e8e-966df0304148
Stahl, Daniel
99314c10-1dda-4c64-bde7-ff8e56dae0ff
Starr, Shelley
8fa717ab-53a4-4df4-8f59-e2be4cc8751d
Valmaggia, Lucia
d441a879-a3dc-4908-bead-c0264285eabf
Williams, Colin
2cbee276-26c0-42eb-9cf9-3280636d61ca
Deluca, Paolo
42ead096-1ac5-4a7b-8ae5-b92af7ec5fad
Brobbin, Eileen
eef57fe5-b468-48ee-ad88-778b2b8a2404
Lowry, Natalie
2db16f5a-2cab-4912-b9b5-8d7b7a66be2d
Cella, Matteo
0d54b80b-d206-4dd2-801f-bc3cc232284e
Copello, Alex
329f111e-542a-47db-968b-2b674ed0851a
Coulton, Simon
1b8604f6-49a9-4818-b06f-258bc0464fed
Di Pietro, Jerome
a663901e-008b-4472-88bb-aa57054d2e08
Drummond, Colin
fb7b0f61-d908-459d-ae9a-83ce3cd37dd2
Glautier, Steven
964468b2-3ad7-40cc-b4be-e35c7dee518f
Kiyak, Ceyda
6b11d02c-b4bc-4bac-bcdb-3f94765c7da6
Phillips, Thomas
b1d4d8f2-b26e-4e89-8e8e-966df0304148
Stahl, Daniel
99314c10-1dda-4c64-bde7-ff8e56dae0ff
Starr, Shelley
8fa717ab-53a4-4df4-8f59-e2be4cc8751d
Valmaggia, Lucia
d441a879-a3dc-4908-bead-c0264285eabf
Williams, Colin
2cbee276-26c0-42eb-9cf9-3280636d61ca
Deluca, Paolo
42ead096-1ac5-4a7b-8ae5-b92af7ec5fad

Brobbin, Eileen, Lowry, Natalie, Cella, Matteo, Copello, Alex, Coulton, Simon, Di Pietro, Jerome, Drummond, Colin, Glautier, Steven, Kiyak, Ceyda, Phillips, Thomas, Stahl, Daniel, Starr, Shelley, Valmaggia, Lucia, Williams, Colin and Deluca, Paolo (2025) Cocaine cues used in experimental research: a systematic review. Brain Sciences, 15 (6), [626]. (doi:10.3390/brainsci15060626).

Record type: Review

Abstract

Aims: cue exposure therapy (CET) is a promising treatment approach for
cocaine substance use disorder (SUD). CET specifically targets the
psychological and physiological responses elicited by drug-related cues, aiming
to reduce their motivational impact. To advance understanding of CET for
cocaine treatment, this systematic review aims to categorise the range of
cocaine cues used in research.

Methods: a systematic review of the existing literature with searches conducted
on PubMed and Web of Science bibliographic databases with no time
constraints in August 2024 (PROSPERO: CRD42024554361). Three reviewers
were independently involved in the screening, review and data extraction
process, in line with PRISMA guidelines. Data extracted included participant
demographics, study design, data on the cocaine cue task, and examples (if
provided). Each study was appraised and received a quality score. The
secondary outcome was to summarise examples for each category type
identified. The data are presented as a narrative synthesis.

Results: 3,600 articles were identified and screened. 235 articles were included
in the analysis. Cues identified included images, paraphernalia, drug-related
words, cocaine smell, auditory stimuli presented via audiotapes, video
recordings, scripts, and virtual reality environments, often combining multiple
modalities. Included studies recruited cocaine-dependent individuals,
recreational users, polydrug users, and non-cocaine-using controls. The sample
sizes of the studies ranged from a single case study to a study including 1,974
participants.

Conclusions: this review found that studies employed a wide range of cue
categories, but detailed examples were often lacking, limiting replication. The
number and combination of cues varied: some studies used only cocaine-
related images, while others included images, videos, physical items, and
audiotapes. The level of immersion and personalisation also differed
considerably. All studies used cocaine-specific cues, most commonly images or
representations of cocaine substance, cocaine use or drug paraphernalia, drug
preparation items, or conversations of cocaine use and its effects. The overall
quality of the included studies was deemed good, with all adhering to standard
research norms. While this review highlights the breath of cue types used in the
literature, further research should focus on enhancing cue exposure techniques
by incorporating more immersive and personalised stimuli, and by providing
clearer documentation of cue characteristics to support replication and clinical
translation.

Text
brainsci-3634940 - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (529kB)
Text
brainsci-15-00626 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (626kB)
Text
brainsci-3634940-supplementary
Download (98kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 6 June 2025
Published date: 10 June 2025
Keywords: cue exposure therapy, cocaine, cocaine-cue reactivity, cocaine treatment, cue-induced cocaine craving, cocaine dependence, cue reactivity

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 503300
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/503300
ISSN: 2076-3425
PURE UUID: 0edf2b4e-5254-487a-b333-8da081062ddf
ORCID for Steven Glautier: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8852-3268

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 29 Jul 2025 16:30
Last modified: 18 Sep 2025 01:36

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Eileen Brobbin
Author: Natalie Lowry
Author: Matteo Cella
Author: Alex Copello
Author: Simon Coulton
Author: Jerome Di Pietro
Author: Colin Drummond
Author: Steven Glautier ORCID iD
Author: Ceyda Kiyak
Author: Thomas Phillips
Author: Daniel Stahl
Author: Shelley Starr
Author: Lucia Valmaggia
Author: Colin Williams
Author: Paolo Deluca

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×