The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

From theory to practice: using the Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to understand implementation of decarbonisation in general practice

From theory to practice: using the Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to understand implementation of decarbonisation in general practice
From theory to practice: using the Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to understand implementation of decarbonisation in general practice
Background: decarbonization in general practice is a critical step toward achieving a net zero healthcare system. Understanding the factors that facilitate or hinder the implementation of environmentally sustainable practices is essential for effective and equitable action. Hence, the overarching aim of this study is to advance understanding of the factors influencing decarbonization in general practice. This study’s objective is to map and compare the application of the Normalization Process Theory (NPT) and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) in understanding the key factors and sub-factors related to decarbonization in general practice.

Methods: factors derived from a systematic review and narrative synthesis were mapped to NPT constructs and TDF domains by a multidisciplinary team of 10 coders, including academic general practitioners (GPs), researchers, and patient representatives. The mapping was conducted independently, and coder agreement was evaluated for consistency and reliability in categorization.

Results: the study identifies key NPT (‘Coherence’, ‘Collective Action’, and ‘Cognitive Participation’) and TDF domains (‘Environmental Context and Resources’, ‘Knowledge’, and ‘Social/professional role and identity’) associated with factors identified in previous research as being associated with achieving decarbonization in general practice. A high intercoder reliability rate (73% for NPT, 84% for TDF) supports the consistency of the analysis, particularly for structured drivers such as financial incentives and policy support.

Conclusions: the findings demonstrate that the NPT and TDF frameworks provide useful, though incomplete, insights into factors influencing decarbonization in general practice. Such factors require more attention when developing evidence-based strategies for promoting decarbonization, something that future research could evaluate.
behaviour change, climate action, decarbonization, emissions reduction, environmental sustainability, net zero healthcare, planetary health, sustainability
0263-2136
Nunes, Ana Raquel
d8e994c5-188b-496c-b347-b1445ef06be1
Atherton, Helen
9bb8932e-7bb7-4781-ab97-114613de99b1
Dahlmann, Frederik
255ad0ee-e968-4f79-b692-467dd9dc703f
Eccles, Abi
a4b3ae4d-5f92-405d-a8f1-b90ec4eb85cf
Geddes, Olivia
92a296bc-5c68-427c-943d-55631e1d6957
Gregg, Michael
6716849e-18ab-469d-ac51-880c1b2230f7
Karaba, Florence
b5a7455b-5552-41df-a79f-65709fd42a81
Spencer, Rachel
34fddac8-b060-49d0-b1d2-3fcf8b5c8a80
Twohig, Helen
26bf0ee8-53f1-4312-9a8f-93fe1022a989
Dale, Jeremy
19fccbd2-1661-4d84-8a94-36bedb12a0e2
Nunes, Ana Raquel
d8e994c5-188b-496c-b347-b1445ef06be1
Atherton, Helen
9bb8932e-7bb7-4781-ab97-114613de99b1
Dahlmann, Frederik
255ad0ee-e968-4f79-b692-467dd9dc703f
Eccles, Abi
a4b3ae4d-5f92-405d-a8f1-b90ec4eb85cf
Geddes, Olivia
92a296bc-5c68-427c-943d-55631e1d6957
Gregg, Michael
6716849e-18ab-469d-ac51-880c1b2230f7
Karaba, Florence
b5a7455b-5552-41df-a79f-65709fd42a81
Spencer, Rachel
34fddac8-b060-49d0-b1d2-3fcf8b5c8a80
Twohig, Helen
26bf0ee8-53f1-4312-9a8f-93fe1022a989
Dale, Jeremy
19fccbd2-1661-4d84-8a94-36bedb12a0e2

Nunes, Ana Raquel, Atherton, Helen, Dahlmann, Frederik, Eccles, Abi, Geddes, Olivia, Gregg, Michael, Karaba, Florence, Spencer, Rachel, Twohig, Helen and Dale, Jeremy (2025) From theory to practice: using the Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to understand implementation of decarbonisation in general practice. Family Practice, 42 (4), [cmaf050]. (doi:10.1093/fampra/cmaf050).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: decarbonization in general practice is a critical step toward achieving a net zero healthcare system. Understanding the factors that facilitate or hinder the implementation of environmentally sustainable practices is essential for effective and equitable action. Hence, the overarching aim of this study is to advance understanding of the factors influencing decarbonization in general practice. This study’s objective is to map and compare the application of the Normalization Process Theory (NPT) and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) in understanding the key factors and sub-factors related to decarbonization in general practice.

Methods: factors derived from a systematic review and narrative synthesis were mapped to NPT constructs and TDF domains by a multidisciplinary team of 10 coders, including academic general practitioners (GPs), researchers, and patient representatives. The mapping was conducted independently, and coder agreement was evaluated for consistency and reliability in categorization.

Results: the study identifies key NPT (‘Coherence’, ‘Collective Action’, and ‘Cognitive Participation’) and TDF domains (‘Environmental Context and Resources’, ‘Knowledge’, and ‘Social/professional role and identity’) associated with factors identified in previous research as being associated with achieving decarbonization in general practice. A high intercoder reliability rate (73% for NPT, 84% for TDF) supports the consistency of the analysis, particularly for structured drivers such as financial incentives and policy support.

Conclusions: the findings demonstrate that the NPT and TDF frameworks provide useful, though incomplete, insights into factors influencing decarbonization in general practice. Such factors require more attention when developing evidence-based strategies for promoting decarbonization, something that future research could evaluate.

Text
cmaf050 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (633kB)
Text
Manuscript_final
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (373kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 2 June 2025
Published date: 2 July 2025
Keywords: behaviour change, climate action, decarbonization, emissions reduction, environmental sustainability, net zero healthcare, planetary health, sustainability

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 503607
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/503607
ISSN: 0263-2136
PURE UUID: 6e9a2201-4b95-4b17-b903-94a64635d8d3
ORCID for Helen Atherton: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7072-1925

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Aug 2025 16:32
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 02:42

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Ana Raquel Nunes
Author: Helen Atherton ORCID iD
Author: Frederik Dahlmann
Author: Abi Eccles
Author: Olivia Geddes
Author: Michael Gregg
Author: Florence Karaba
Author: Rachel Spencer
Author: Helen Twohig
Author: Jeremy Dale

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×