The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A sharing practices review of the visual search and eye movements literature reveals recommendations for our field and others

A sharing practices review of the visual search and eye movements literature reveals recommendations for our field and others
A sharing practices review of the visual search and eye movements literature reveals recommendations for our field and others
The sharing of outputs from scientific research is an important endeavor; one that is required at an increasing rate by funders and publishers alike. Here, we catalogued and examined data sharing practices, using our own field of visual search and eye movement behavior as an example. To find outputs from scientific research, we conducted two searches: a Literature Search and a Repository Search. Overall, we found that researchers in our field generally shared outputs that enabled others to analytically reproduce published results. It was rare for researchers to share outputs that enabled direct replications of their work, and it was also rare for researchers to share raw data that would enable secondary data analyses. Comparing the results of our two searches of the literature, we found that a lack of metadata substantially reduced the rates at which outputs could be found and used. Based on our findings, we present a set of recommendations summarized in our ‘Find It – Access It – Reuse It’ scorecard. The scorecard is intended to assist researchers in sharing outputs in a manner that will enable others to better find, access, and understand them – and this includes researchers in other fields beyond our own.
Data sharing, Eye tracking, Open science, Secondary data analyses, Sharing practices review, Visual search
1554-351X
Godwin, Hayward J.
df22dc0c-01d1-440a-a369-a763801851e5
Dewis, Haden
8bfc20ea-9a60-48f6-bb25-00c4d4252a84
Darch, Peter T.
e2873c95-fc2f-4629-af6c-ba0241b5435e
Hout, Michael C.
79882490-f79b-4e7d-990a-fdcdcb87f3ce
Ernst, Daniel
1f9c983f-c27f-4176-9429-d678c26b8670
Broadbent, Philippa
f9e72e3e-0692-4257-9ab8-f79179d3d18f
Papesh, Megan
398b47b1-3004-4cde-8a5f-7136aafdd8fa
Wolfe, Jeremy M.
940c81fb-44f8-4eff-b172-a43730b2fd92
Godwin, Hayward J.
df22dc0c-01d1-440a-a369-a763801851e5
Dewis, Haden
8bfc20ea-9a60-48f6-bb25-00c4d4252a84
Darch, Peter T.
e2873c95-fc2f-4629-af6c-ba0241b5435e
Hout, Michael C.
79882490-f79b-4e7d-990a-fdcdcb87f3ce
Ernst, Daniel
1f9c983f-c27f-4176-9429-d678c26b8670
Broadbent, Philippa
f9e72e3e-0692-4257-9ab8-f79179d3d18f
Papesh, Megan
398b47b1-3004-4cde-8a5f-7136aafdd8fa
Wolfe, Jeremy M.
940c81fb-44f8-4eff-b172-a43730b2fd92

Godwin, Hayward J., Dewis, Haden, Darch, Peter T., Hout, Michael C., Ernst, Daniel, Broadbent, Philippa, Papesh, Megan and Wolfe, Jeremy M. (2025) A sharing practices review of the visual search and eye movements literature reveals recommendations for our field and others. Behavior Research Methods, 57 (9), [235]. (doi:10.3758/s13428-025-02759-3).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The sharing of outputs from scientific research is an important endeavor; one that is required at an increasing rate by funders and publishers alike. Here, we catalogued and examined data sharing practices, using our own field of visual search and eye movement behavior as an example. To find outputs from scientific research, we conducted two searches: a Literature Search and a Repository Search. Overall, we found that researchers in our field generally shared outputs that enabled others to analytically reproduce published results. It was rare for researchers to share outputs that enabled direct replications of their work, and it was also rare for researchers to share raw data that would enable secondary data analyses. Comparing the results of our two searches of the literature, we found that a lack of metadata substantially reduced the rates at which outputs could be found and used. Based on our findings, we present a set of recommendations summarized in our ‘Find It – Access It – Reuse It’ scorecard. The scorecard is intended to assist researchers in sharing outputs in a manner that will enable others to better find, access, and understand them – and this includes researchers in other fields beyond our own.

Text
Accepted Manuscript Changes Accepted - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (853kB)
Text
s13428-025-02759-3 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 20 June 2025
Published date: 25 July 2025
Keywords: Data sharing, Eye tracking, Open science, Secondary data analyses, Sharing practices review, Visual search

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 503621
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/503621
ISSN: 1554-351X
PURE UUID: 14cef750-715d-427c-99b7-47573831a9dc
ORCID for Hayward J. Godwin: ORCID iD orcid.org/0009-0005-1232-500X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Aug 2025 16:37
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 02:01

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Haden Dewis
Author: Peter T. Darch
Author: Michael C. Hout
Author: Daniel Ernst
Author: Philippa Broadbent
Author: Megan Papesh
Author: Jeremy M. Wolfe

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×