Subsidiarity as a normative political concept: contemporary and historical reflections
Subsidiarity as a normative political concept: contemporary and historical reflections
Subsidiarity is a principle holding that final decision-making authority should presumptively belong to the candidate authority claimant ‘closest’ to the decision or those affected by or subject to that decision. The concept has a long historical pedigree and features prominently in numerous ongoing political, legal, and philosophical debates. However, the concept admits multiple interpretations. It is very difficult to specify and justify a distinct conception of subsidiarity that is capable of fulfilling the many roles it is asked to play in contemporary debates. It is more difficult still to develop a conception that also reflects historical uses of the term ‘subsidiarity.’ Recent scholarship offers several potential responses to these difficulties, though each presents its own challenges. The articles in this special issue help develop these lines of response. In so doing, they offer insights into a variety of related substantive and methodological issues in contemporary political philosophy. This introduction provides an overview of questions and challenges raised by subsidiarity as well as the articles that follow.
Subsidiarity, Federalism, Political Theory, Political Philosophy, Authority, pluralism, Europea Union Law, Catholic Social Thought, sovereignty, Althusius, Associations
Da Silva, Michael
05ad649f-8409-4012-8edc-88709b1a3182
Weinstock, Daniel
84bb911e-a6a2-40c3-9df8-188dbd36354c
Da Silva, Michael
05ad649f-8409-4012-8edc-88709b1a3182
Weinstock, Daniel
84bb911e-a6a2-40c3-9df8-188dbd36354c
Da Silva, Michael and Weinstock, Daniel
(2025)
Subsidiarity as a normative political concept: contemporary and historical reflections.
Journal of Social Philosophy.
(doi:10.1111/josp.70013).
Abstract
Subsidiarity is a principle holding that final decision-making authority should presumptively belong to the candidate authority claimant ‘closest’ to the decision or those affected by or subject to that decision. The concept has a long historical pedigree and features prominently in numerous ongoing political, legal, and philosophical debates. However, the concept admits multiple interpretations. It is very difficult to specify and justify a distinct conception of subsidiarity that is capable of fulfilling the many roles it is asked to play in contemporary debates. It is more difficult still to develop a conception that also reflects historical uses of the term ‘subsidiarity.’ Recent scholarship offers several potential responses to these difficulties, though each presents its own challenges. The articles in this special issue help develop these lines of response. In so doing, they offer insights into a variety of related substantive and methodological issues in contemporary political philosophy. This introduction provides an overview of questions and challenges raised by subsidiarity as well as the articles that follow.
Text
SI Introduction AAM
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
Journal of Social Philosophy - 2025 - Da Silva - Subsidiarity as a Normative Political Concept Contemporary and Historical
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 20 August 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 28 August 2025
Keywords:
Subsidiarity, Federalism, Political Theory, Political Philosophy, Authority, pluralism, Europea Union Law, Catholic Social Thought, sovereignty, Althusius, Associations
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 505281
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/505281
ISSN: 0047-2786
PURE UUID: dfe3b548-41d9-4472-ae23-44deb2d0acc3
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 06 Oct 2025 16:37
Last modified: 07 Oct 2025 02:06
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Michael Da Silva
Author:
Daniel Weinstock
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics