The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Dinutuximab beta versus naxitamab in the treatment of re-lapsed/refractory neuroblastoma in patients with stable disease, minor response or partial response and disease in bone or bone marrow: systematic review and matching-adjusted indirect comparison

Dinutuximab beta versus naxitamab in the treatment of re-lapsed/refractory neuroblastoma in patients with stable disease, minor response or partial response and disease in bone or bone marrow: systematic review and matching-adjusted indirect comparison
Dinutuximab beta versus naxitamab in the treatment of re-lapsed/refractory neuroblastoma in patients with stable disease, minor response or partial response and disease in bone or bone marrow: systematic review and matching-adjusted indirect comparison

Objective: Dinutuximab beta (DB) and naxitamab (NAXI) with GM-CSF are used for maintenance treatment of relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma. The objective of this study was to systematically assess comparative efficacy of the two therapies within their designated indications in accordance with established clinical guidelines. Methods: Relevant evidence was identified in systematic literature review. Individual patient data (IPD) from prospective clinical trials of DB were assessed and data on patients with disease in bone or bone marrow, as assessed in MRI, CT, mIBG or biopsy, with incomplete response to previous therapy were included. Patients with complete response, progressive disease and/or soft tissue disease were excluded. DB population was adjusted for sex, MYCN amplification, disease type (relapsed, refractory), and disease site (bone marrow and/or bone) to balance aggregated characteristics of NAXI population. More characteristics were included in sensitivity analyses, including DB treatment without interleukin-2, as currently recommended. Overall response rate (ORR) was assessed as best response. Results: Aggregated data for NAXI from Study 201 (n = 52) and Study 230 (n = 38) and IPD from DB studies (APN311-202, APN311-304, c = 77) met the inclusion criteria. Compared to NAXI, DB significantly extended progression-free survival (PFS): hazard ratio, DB vs. NAXI of 0.47 (95% CI: 0.26 to 0.87, p = 0.015). ORR was 60.1% (95% CI: 48.5% to 71.6%) for DB vs. 43.3% (33.1% to 53.6%) for NAXI (ORR odds ratio, DB vs. NAXI was 1.97, 95% CI: 1.02 to 3.80, p = 0.044). Sensitivity analyses and unadjusted comparisons supported the results. Conclusion: In the indirect comparison, dinutuximab beta significantly extended PFS and increased ORR compared to naxitamab.

dinutuximab beta, matching-adjusted indirect comparison, naxitamab, relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma, systematic review
2072-6694
Lode, Holger N.
c6482d76-8235-40b9-adbd-1d3cae4ac2c3
Holko, Przemysław
fc205ead-5907-4945-bfe9-a4de8b578a39
Wieczorek, Aleksandra
5890e74a-d232-458e-889e-3fc4ebae6b04
Gray, Juliet
12d5e17c-97bb-4d6d-8fc4-3914b730ed42
et al.
Lode, Holger N.
c6482d76-8235-40b9-adbd-1d3cae4ac2c3
Holko, Przemysław
fc205ead-5907-4945-bfe9-a4de8b578a39
Wieczorek, Aleksandra
5890e74a-d232-458e-889e-3fc4ebae6b04
Gray, Juliet
12d5e17c-97bb-4d6d-8fc4-3914b730ed42

Lode, Holger N., Holko, Przemysław and Wieczorek, Aleksandra , et al. (2025) Dinutuximab beta versus naxitamab in the treatment of re-lapsed/refractory neuroblastoma in patients with stable disease, minor response or partial response and disease in bone or bone marrow: systematic review and matching-adjusted indirect comparison. Cancers, 17 (17), [2723]. (doi:10.3390/cancers17172723).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective: Dinutuximab beta (DB) and naxitamab (NAXI) with GM-CSF are used for maintenance treatment of relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma. The objective of this study was to systematically assess comparative efficacy of the two therapies within their designated indications in accordance with established clinical guidelines. Methods: Relevant evidence was identified in systematic literature review. Individual patient data (IPD) from prospective clinical trials of DB were assessed and data on patients with disease in bone or bone marrow, as assessed in MRI, CT, mIBG or biopsy, with incomplete response to previous therapy were included. Patients with complete response, progressive disease and/or soft tissue disease were excluded. DB population was adjusted for sex, MYCN amplification, disease type (relapsed, refractory), and disease site (bone marrow and/or bone) to balance aggregated characteristics of NAXI population. More characteristics were included in sensitivity analyses, including DB treatment without interleukin-2, as currently recommended. Overall response rate (ORR) was assessed as best response. Results: Aggregated data for NAXI from Study 201 (n = 52) and Study 230 (n = 38) and IPD from DB studies (APN311-202, APN311-304, c = 77) met the inclusion criteria. Compared to NAXI, DB significantly extended progression-free survival (PFS): hazard ratio, DB vs. NAXI of 0.47 (95% CI: 0.26 to 0.87, p = 0.015). ORR was 60.1% (95% CI: 48.5% to 71.6%) for DB vs. 43.3% (33.1% to 53.6%) for NAXI (ORR odds ratio, DB vs. NAXI was 1.97, 95% CI: 1.02 to 3.80, p = 0.044). Sensitivity analyses and unadjusted comparisons supported the results. Conclusion: In the indirect comparison, dinutuximab beta significantly extended PFS and increased ORR compared to naxitamab.

Text
cancers-3808240 - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (490kB)
Text
cancers-17-02723-v2 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 15 August 2025
Published date: 22 August 2025
Keywords: dinutuximab beta, matching-adjusted indirect comparison, naxitamab, relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma, systematic review

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 505283
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/505283
ISSN: 2072-6694
PURE UUID: 5e16388e-c31c-4a58-922c-a990a6892be2
ORCID for Juliet Gray: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5652-4722

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Oct 2025 16:41
Last modified: 26 Nov 2025 02:38

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Holger N. Lode
Author: Przemysław Holko
Author: Aleksandra Wieczorek
Author: Juliet Gray ORCID iD
Corporate Author: et al.

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×