The epistemic case for federalism: a framework and critical analysis
The epistemic case for federalism: a framework and critical analysis
Philosophers of federalism and political epistemologists address common issues and face similar burdens in establishing their claims. Yet federalism studies and political epistemology rarely intersect, leaving core concepts in each undeveloped and core questions unaddressed. This work demonstrates the value of treating them together. It synthesizes prior work in both fields to specify and evaluate leading epistemic arguments for decentralization and federalism. It thereby provides a taxonomy of the leading epistemic arguments, motivates a new research agenda on the epistemic aspects of decentralization and federalism, and introduces tools previously unknown to federal studies that one can fruitfully use to pursue that agenda. It also provides substantive insights into how epistemic considerations implicate the legitimacy of decentralized or federal governance. It finds that each leading epistemic argument for decentralization comes with significant epistemic trade-offs, and even the best ones do not strongly support federalism. Any justification for federalism is, accordingly, likely to be non-epistemic.
Political Epistemology, Federalism, Authority, Legitimacy, Competence, Political Philosophy, Political Theory, Participation, Policy Experiments
Da Silva, Michael
05ad649f-8409-4012-8edc-88709b1a3182
Da Silva, Michael
05ad649f-8409-4012-8edc-88709b1a3182
Da Silva, Michael
(2025)
The epistemic case for federalism: a framework and critical analysis.
Publius.
(In Press)
Abstract
Philosophers of federalism and political epistemologists address common issues and face similar burdens in establishing their claims. Yet federalism studies and political epistemology rarely intersect, leaving core concepts in each undeveloped and core questions unaddressed. This work demonstrates the value of treating them together. It synthesizes prior work in both fields to specify and evaluate leading epistemic arguments for decentralization and federalism. It thereby provides a taxonomy of the leading epistemic arguments, motivates a new research agenda on the epistemic aspects of decentralization and federalism, and introduces tools previously unknown to federal studies that one can fruitfully use to pursue that agenda. It also provides substantive insights into how epistemic considerations implicate the legitimacy of decentralized or federal governance. It finds that each leading epistemic argument for decentralization comes with significant epistemic trade-offs, and even the best ones do not strongly support federalism. Any justification for federalism is, accordingly, likely to be non-epistemic.
Text
Publius AAM
- Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 14 August 2026.
Request a copy
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 14 August 2025
Keywords:
Political Epistemology, Federalism, Authority, Legitimacy, Competence, Political Philosophy, Political Theory, Participation, Policy Experiments
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 505370
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/505370
ISSN: 0048-5950
PURE UUID: 41c3d847-df36-4fcc-9d85-eaf0e4a8138a
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 07 Oct 2025 16:50
Last modified: 08 Oct 2025 02:05
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Michael Da Silva
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics