The experience of bedside nurses delivering and intensive care sedation study: a process evaluation within the A2B study
The experience of bedside nurses delivering and intensive care sedation study: a process evaluation within the A2B study
Background: This process evaluation explored delivery of a complex sedation intervention within the Alpha-2 Agonists for Sedation to Produce Better Outcomes from Critical Illness (A2B) trial, which compared dexmedetomidine- and clonidine-based sedation with propofol (usual care). All groups targeted lighter sedation levels. The objective was to understand bedside nurses’ experiences delivering the interventions and identify factors influencing protocol adherence and implementation. Methods: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was conducted with intensive care unit (ICU) staff (consultants, bedside and research nurses) from A2B trial sites. Thematic analysis explored how participants experienced and delivered trial interventions, with particular focus on bedside nurses’ abilities to manage sedation in line with the protocol. Results: Nurses with greater ICU experience described more confidence and adaptability in using alpha-2 agonists, while less experienced staff required support due to limited familiarity with lighter sedation. Hesitancy to up-titrate alpha-2 agonists was common, driven by concerns about bradycardia and hypotension. Reluctance to down-titrate propofol was shaped by fears of agitation and self-extubation. Deep sedation norms, especially amongst nurses trained during the COVID-19 pandemic, further hindered protocol adherence. Research nurses were instrumental in supporting implementation and bridging knowledge gaps. Conclusion: Despite all three trial groups targeting lighter sedation, nurse confidence, safety concerns, and ingrained cultural practices limited adherence to alpha-2 agonist-based protocols. Addressing these barriers through training, support, and cultural change will be essential for future trials and practice shifts involving lighter sedation strategies in ICU. Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03653832 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03653832
critical care, nurses, process evaluation, qualitative research, sedation
Emerson, Lydia
6ba94f64-865c-4f45-bcbd-837085530c98
Aitken, L.M.
ba136971-d8e4-418f-80af-df6d67dff207
Kydonaki, K.
9bba2655-62b4-4734-8341-25c62519a37a
Mckenzie, Cathrine
13ad9cca-fa4f-451b-a3f4-5c83d1ef3b8c
Lone, Nazir I.
c45a0850-9684-481c-8098-e3de4eaa311f
Blackwood, Bronagh
4fa7b74c-663d-43bd-b89c-20dc21d0d7b8
Walsh, Timothy
755f19b7-901c-4078-8146-b3fd14ad79d0
Emerson, Lydia
6ba94f64-865c-4f45-bcbd-837085530c98
Aitken, L.M.
ba136971-d8e4-418f-80af-df6d67dff207
Kydonaki, K.
9bba2655-62b4-4734-8341-25c62519a37a
Mckenzie, Cathrine
13ad9cca-fa4f-451b-a3f4-5c83d1ef3b8c
Lone, Nazir I.
c45a0850-9684-481c-8098-e3de4eaa311f
Blackwood, Bronagh
4fa7b74c-663d-43bd-b89c-20dc21d0d7b8
Walsh, Timothy
755f19b7-901c-4078-8146-b3fd14ad79d0
Emerson, Lydia, Aitken, L.M., Kydonaki, K., Mckenzie, Cathrine, Lone, Nazir I., Blackwood, Bronagh and Walsh, Timothy
(2025)
The experience of bedside nurses delivering and intensive care sedation study: a process evaluation within the A2B study.
Journal of the Intensive Care Society.
(doi:10.1177/17511437251381951).
Abstract
Background: This process evaluation explored delivery of a complex sedation intervention within the Alpha-2 Agonists for Sedation to Produce Better Outcomes from Critical Illness (A2B) trial, which compared dexmedetomidine- and clonidine-based sedation with propofol (usual care). All groups targeted lighter sedation levels. The objective was to understand bedside nurses’ experiences delivering the interventions and identify factors influencing protocol adherence and implementation. Methods: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was conducted with intensive care unit (ICU) staff (consultants, bedside and research nurses) from A2B trial sites. Thematic analysis explored how participants experienced and delivered trial interventions, with particular focus on bedside nurses’ abilities to manage sedation in line with the protocol. Results: Nurses with greater ICU experience described more confidence and adaptability in using alpha-2 agonists, while less experienced staff required support due to limited familiarity with lighter sedation. Hesitancy to up-titrate alpha-2 agonists was common, driven by concerns about bradycardia and hypotension. Reluctance to down-titrate propofol was shaped by fears of agitation and self-extubation. Deep sedation norms, especially amongst nurses trained during the COVID-19 pandemic, further hindered protocol adherence. Research nurses were instrumental in supporting implementation and bridging knowledge gaps. Conclusion: Despite all three trial groups targeting lighter sedation, nurse confidence, safety concerns, and ingrained cultural practices limited adherence to alpha-2 agonist-based protocols. Addressing these barriers through training, support, and cultural change will be essential for future trials and practice shifts involving lighter sedation strategies in ICU. Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03653832 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03653832
Text
A2B_PE_JICS_accepted_version (1)
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 3 September 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 6 November 2025
Keywords:
critical care, nurses, process evaluation, qualitative research, sedation
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 506072
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/506072
ISSN: 1751-1437
PURE UUID: 9db252b2-e48a-4040-abf1-092a10984212
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 28 Oct 2025 17:44
Last modified: 19 May 2026 02:13
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Lydia Emerson
Author:
L.M. Aitken
Author:
K. Kydonaki
Author:
Cathrine Mckenzie
Author:
Nazir I. Lone
Author:
Bronagh Blackwood
Author:
Timothy Walsh
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics