The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Exploring predictors of phantom phone signals: phone use, hallucination-proneness and delusional ideation

Exploring predictors of phantom phone signals: phone use, hallucination-proneness and delusional ideation
Exploring predictors of phantom phone signals: phone use, hallucination-proneness and delusional ideation
Background: Phantom Phone Signals (PPS) are false perceptions that a smartphone has vibrated or made a sound. PPS are typically non-distressing, non-disruptive hallucinations. Increased PPS likelihood is linked to frequent and problematic phone use, mood, anxiety and hallucination-proneness. This study aimed to investigate the role of resilience, delusion-proneness, and metacognition on PPS.

Method: this online, self-report, questionnaire study included 265 participants (mean age: 19.74; 84.2% female, no experience of psychosis). Participants completed the Phantom Phone Experiences and Appraisal Scale (PPEAS) to assess PPS, along with the Problematic Use of Mobile Phone Scale (PUMP), Resilience Scale (RS-14), Multi-Modality Unusual Sensory Experiences Questionnaire (MUSEQ), Peters Delusion Inventory (PDI-21), and Metacognition Self-Assessment Scale (MSAS).

Results: PPS were prevalent, with 86.8% of participants reporting at least one phantom phone experience. These experiences were generally infrequent, non-distressing, and non-disruptive, as reflected in low PPEAS Composite Impact Scores (M = 4.25, SD = 3.66). PPS were significantly correlated with Problematic phone use (r = .345), hallucination-proneness (r = .321) and delusional ideation (r =.226), but not resilience or metacognition. Regression analyses indicated that higher MUSEQ and higher PUMP scores were associated with higher odds of experiencing more PPS and explained 18% variance in PPEAS Composite Impact Scores. This direct relationship was not mediated or moderated by resilience or metacognition.

Conclusion: PPS are highly prevalent amongst university students and are primarily a benign experience influenced by problematic phone use and hallucination-proneness. Behavioural interventions may be the most effective approach for reducing PPS where required.
Palmer-Cooper, Emma C.
e96e8cb6-2221-4dc7-b556-603f2cf6b086
Espina Mamode, Lana
101235a4-f29d-44e2-870d-ac4d00bb9565
Woollard, Daniel
7b45f2da-bcdd-49dc-a2b6-d3ce451e0e8e
Dewis, Haden
69fc0555-10f2-4e3f-89d7-a6f1c509c748
Palmer-Cooper, Emma C.
e96e8cb6-2221-4dc7-b556-603f2cf6b086
Espina Mamode, Lana
101235a4-f29d-44e2-870d-ac4d00bb9565
Woollard, Daniel
7b45f2da-bcdd-49dc-a2b6-d3ce451e0e8e
Dewis, Haden
69fc0555-10f2-4e3f-89d7-a6f1c509c748

[Unknown type: UNSPECIFIED]

Record type: UNSPECIFIED

Abstract

Background: Phantom Phone Signals (PPS) are false perceptions that a smartphone has vibrated or made a sound. PPS are typically non-distressing, non-disruptive hallucinations. Increased PPS likelihood is linked to frequent and problematic phone use, mood, anxiety and hallucination-proneness. This study aimed to investigate the role of resilience, delusion-proneness, and metacognition on PPS.

Method: this online, self-report, questionnaire study included 265 participants (mean age: 19.74; 84.2% female, no experience of psychosis). Participants completed the Phantom Phone Experiences and Appraisal Scale (PPEAS) to assess PPS, along with the Problematic Use of Mobile Phone Scale (PUMP), Resilience Scale (RS-14), Multi-Modality Unusual Sensory Experiences Questionnaire (MUSEQ), Peters Delusion Inventory (PDI-21), and Metacognition Self-Assessment Scale (MSAS).

Results: PPS were prevalent, with 86.8% of participants reporting at least one phantom phone experience. These experiences were generally infrequent, non-distressing, and non-disruptive, as reflected in low PPEAS Composite Impact Scores (M = 4.25, SD = 3.66). PPS were significantly correlated with Problematic phone use (r = .345), hallucination-proneness (r = .321) and delusional ideation (r =.226), but not resilience or metacognition. Regression analyses indicated that higher MUSEQ and higher PUMP scores were associated with higher odds of experiencing more PPS and explained 18% variance in PPEAS Composite Impact Scores. This direct relationship was not mediated or moderated by resilience or metacognition.

Conclusion: PPS are highly prevalent amongst university students and are primarily a benign experience influenced by problematic phone use and hallucination-proneness. Behavioural interventions may be the most effective approach for reducing PPS where required.

Text
PhantomPhoneResilience_MS_CHB_preprint - Author's Original
Download (419kB)

More information

Submitted date: 26 November 2025

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 507750
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/507750
PURE UUID: a37ae30f-b8bc-4efe-a868-e99333a69246
ORCID for Emma C. Palmer-Cooper: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5416-1518

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Jan 2026 10:58
Last modified: 08 Jan 2026 03:02

Export record

Contributors

Author: Lana Espina Mamode
Author: Daniel Woollard
Author: Haden Dewis

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×