Exploring predictors of phantom phone signals: phone use, hallucination-proneness and delusional ideation
Exploring predictors of phantom phone signals: phone use, hallucination-proneness and delusional ideation
Background: Phantom Phone Signals (PPS) are false perceptions that a smartphone has vibrated or made a sound. PPS are typically non-distressing, non-disruptive hallucinations. Increased PPS likelihood is linked to frequent and problematic phone use, mood, anxiety and hallucination-proneness. This study aimed to investigate the role of resilience, delusion-proneness, and metacognition on PPS.
Method: this online, self-report, questionnaire study included 265 participants (mean age: 19.74; 84.2% female, no experience of psychosis). Participants completed the Phantom Phone Experiences and Appraisal Scale (PPEAS) to assess PPS, along with the Problematic Use of Mobile Phone Scale (PUMP), Resilience Scale (RS-14), Multi-Modality Unusual Sensory Experiences Questionnaire (MUSEQ), Peters Delusion Inventory (PDI-21), and Metacognition Self-Assessment Scale (MSAS).
Results: PPS were prevalent, with 86.8% of participants reporting at least one phantom phone experience. These experiences were generally infrequent, non-distressing, and non-disruptive, as reflected in low PPEAS Composite Impact Scores (M = 4.25, SD = 3.66). PPS were significantly correlated with Problematic phone use (r = .345), hallucination-proneness (r = .321) and delusional ideation (r =.226), but not resilience or metacognition. Regression analyses indicated that higher MUSEQ and higher PUMP scores were associated with higher odds of experiencing more PPS and explained 18% variance in PPEAS Composite Impact Scores. This direct relationship was not mediated or moderated by resilience or metacognition.
Conclusion: PPS are highly prevalent amongst university students and are primarily a benign experience influenced by problematic phone use and hallucination-proneness. Behavioural interventions may be the most effective approach for reducing PPS where required.
Palmer-Cooper, Emma C.
e96e8cb6-2221-4dc7-b556-603f2cf6b086
Espina Mamode, Lana
101235a4-f29d-44e2-870d-ac4d00bb9565
Woollard, Daniel
7b45f2da-bcdd-49dc-a2b6-d3ce451e0e8e
Dewis, Haden
69fc0555-10f2-4e3f-89d7-a6f1c509c748
Palmer-Cooper, Emma C.
e96e8cb6-2221-4dc7-b556-603f2cf6b086
Espina Mamode, Lana
101235a4-f29d-44e2-870d-ac4d00bb9565
Woollard, Daniel
7b45f2da-bcdd-49dc-a2b6-d3ce451e0e8e
Dewis, Haden
69fc0555-10f2-4e3f-89d7-a6f1c509c748
[Unknown type: UNSPECIFIED]
Abstract
Background: Phantom Phone Signals (PPS) are false perceptions that a smartphone has vibrated or made a sound. PPS are typically non-distressing, non-disruptive hallucinations. Increased PPS likelihood is linked to frequent and problematic phone use, mood, anxiety and hallucination-proneness. This study aimed to investigate the role of resilience, delusion-proneness, and metacognition on PPS.
Method: this online, self-report, questionnaire study included 265 participants (mean age: 19.74; 84.2% female, no experience of psychosis). Participants completed the Phantom Phone Experiences and Appraisal Scale (PPEAS) to assess PPS, along with the Problematic Use of Mobile Phone Scale (PUMP), Resilience Scale (RS-14), Multi-Modality Unusual Sensory Experiences Questionnaire (MUSEQ), Peters Delusion Inventory (PDI-21), and Metacognition Self-Assessment Scale (MSAS).
Results: PPS were prevalent, with 86.8% of participants reporting at least one phantom phone experience. These experiences were generally infrequent, non-distressing, and non-disruptive, as reflected in low PPEAS Composite Impact Scores (M = 4.25, SD = 3.66). PPS were significantly correlated with Problematic phone use (r = .345), hallucination-proneness (r = .321) and delusional ideation (r =.226), but not resilience or metacognition. Regression analyses indicated that higher MUSEQ and higher PUMP scores were associated with higher odds of experiencing more PPS and explained 18% variance in PPEAS Composite Impact Scores. This direct relationship was not mediated or moderated by resilience or metacognition.
Conclusion: PPS are highly prevalent amongst university students and are primarily a benign experience influenced by problematic phone use and hallucination-proneness. Behavioural interventions may be the most effective approach for reducing PPS where required.
Text
PhantomPhoneResilience_MS_CHB_preprint
- Author's Original
More information
Submitted date: 26 November 2025
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 507750
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/507750
PURE UUID: a37ae30f-b8bc-4efe-a868-e99333a69246
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 06 Jan 2026 10:58
Last modified: 08 Jan 2026 03:02
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Lana Espina Mamode
Author:
Daniel Woollard
Author:
Haden Dewis
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics