The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Threat acquisition and extinction differences between patients with panic disorder or specific phobia and non-clinical controls: a systematic review

Threat acquisition and extinction differences between patients with panic disorder or specific phobia and non-clinical controls: a systematic review
Threat acquisition and extinction differences between patients with panic disorder or specific phobia and non-clinical controls: a systematic review
The study of threat conditioning and extinction processes in anxiety disorders (AD) may further our understanding of the genesis, maintenance, and treatment of these conditions. As it stands, there have been multiple systematic reviews carried out in this area. Patient-control differences in threat acquisition and extinction have been investigated in relation to ADs, obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), and social anxiety disorder (SAD). However, this remains to be investigated in either panic disorder (PD) or specific phobia (SP). In this paper, a narrative systematic review was carried out to collate and critically assess the literature investigating patient-control differences in threat acquisition, extinction, and extinction retention processes in relation to PD and SP separately. Specifically, across fMRI, EEG, EMG, SCR, and self-report. This resulted in the inclusion of 14 PD studies and 7 SP studies. Across PD studies, the review identified reliable evidence for lowered discrimination between conditioned threat and safety cues, and mixed evidence for increased responding to the threat cue, during acquisition in PD patients vs. non-anxious controls. Across SP studies, the review identified strong evidence for heightened discrimination between conditioned threat and safety cues during acquisition, and strong evidence for heightened responding to the threat cue during extinction, in SP patients vs. non-anxious controls. In both PD and SP studies, patient-control differences were identified more frequently in relation to subjective, as opposed to physiological, measures. The findings of this review are then critiqued and compared to the wider literature. Finally, implications, limitations, and directions for future research are discussed.
1074-7427
Steggles, Kane Reece
1334ee22-f855-459b-a01d-368b57116c64
Garner, Matthew
3221c5b3-b951-4fec-b456-ec449e4ce072
Morriss, Jayne
a6005806-07cf-4283-8766-900003a7306f
Steggles, Kane Reece
1334ee22-f855-459b-a01d-368b57116c64
Garner, Matthew
3221c5b3-b951-4fec-b456-ec449e4ce072
Morriss, Jayne
a6005806-07cf-4283-8766-900003a7306f

Steggles, Kane Reece, Garner, Matthew and Morriss, Jayne (2025) Threat acquisition and extinction differences between patients with panic disorder or specific phobia and non-clinical controls: a systematic review. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 223. (doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2025.108125).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The study of threat conditioning and extinction processes in anxiety disorders (AD) may further our understanding of the genesis, maintenance, and treatment of these conditions. As it stands, there have been multiple systematic reviews carried out in this area. Patient-control differences in threat acquisition and extinction have been investigated in relation to ADs, obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), and social anxiety disorder (SAD). However, this remains to be investigated in either panic disorder (PD) or specific phobia (SP). In this paper, a narrative systematic review was carried out to collate and critically assess the literature investigating patient-control differences in threat acquisition, extinction, and extinction retention processes in relation to PD and SP separately. Specifically, across fMRI, EEG, EMG, SCR, and self-report. This resulted in the inclusion of 14 PD studies and 7 SP studies. Across PD studies, the review identified reliable evidence for lowered discrimination between conditioned threat and safety cues, and mixed evidence for increased responding to the threat cue, during acquisition in PD patients vs. non-anxious controls. Across SP studies, the review identified strong evidence for heightened discrimination between conditioned threat and safety cues during acquisition, and strong evidence for heightened responding to the threat cue during extinction, in SP patients vs. non-anxious controls. In both PD and SP studies, patient-control differences were identified more frequently in relation to subjective, as opposed to physiological, measures. The findings of this review are then critiqued and compared to the wider literature. Finally, implications, limitations, and directions for future research are discussed.

Text
PD_SP_review_manuscript_R2_clean - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (175kB)
Text
1-s2.0-S1074742725001066-main - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 7 December 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 16 December 2025
Published date: 24 December 2025

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 508583
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/508583
ISSN: 1074-7427
PURE UUID: d0ee0aa8-41fd-47cf-87a6-316434a5172c
ORCID for Kane Reece Steggles: ORCID iD orcid.org/0009-0004-3577-3000
ORCID for Matthew Garner: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9481-2226
ORCID for Jayne Morriss: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7928-9673

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 27 Jan 2026 18:03
Last modified: 28 Jan 2026 04:27

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Kane Reece Steggles ORCID iD
Author: Matthew Garner ORCID iD
Author: Jayne Morriss ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×