The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Traditional methods, consumers’ stereotyping of farmers and the compensatory effects of ethical food cues

Traditional methods, consumers’ stereotyping of farmers and the compensatory effects of ethical food cues
Traditional methods, consumers’ stereotyping of farmers and the compensatory effects of ethical food cues
Attesting to the growing interest in ethical food, scholarship has examined how consumers respond to different cues associated with food ethicality. However, the psychological mechanisms through which ethical food cues shape consumer preferences have been overlooked. Focusing on an underexamined cue (traditional production methods) and drawing from the Stereotype Content Model, this study examines whether a warmth stereotyping of farmers may explain the influence of this cue on consumer preferences. Moreover, the paper also explores how the interaction of cues of localness and traditionality affect farmers’ perception. The paper documents compensatory effects between traditional methods and localness in specific circumstances. Two online experiments (Study 1 N = 291; Study 2 N = 183) were conducted to test the hypotheses. We manipulate farming methods and localness and measure perceptions of warmth and consumer responses to the profile of a fictitious farm. A model of moderated mediation is examined which identifies compensatory effects between traditional farming methods and perceptions of localness.
A warm stereotype of farmers explains the positive effect of traditional farming methods and localness on consumers’ food attitudes and preferences. Furthermore, different ethical cues can have a compensatory effect on consumers’ perceptions of warmth. Specifically, for consumers with strong opposition to long supply chains, the adoption of traditional farming methods compensates for the perceived warmth of geographically distant farmers. Thus, consumers who would usually dislike distant farmers retain a positive impression of them if these farmers can boast traditional farming cues. Furthermore, we find no evidence of an additive effect between traditional farming methods and localness on warmth: the addition of the two cues does not significantly increase perceptions of farmers’ warmth. The study demonstrates that the social perception of farmers plays a key role in food preferences and the perception of ethical cues in food consumption. Moreover, it shows how different cues may influence perceptions of warmth depending on consumers’ involvement.
For the promotion of ethical food systems, farmers could increase favorable consumer attitudes by foregrounding the ethical cues of localness and traditional farming methods. The results extend our understanding of the mechanisms underpinning preferences for ethical food and explicate how multiple ethical cues influence ethical food consumption.
Ethical food, Experiments, Locavorism, Persuasion, Stereotype content model, Traditional production
0309-0566
1891-1912
Antonetti, Paolo
89c2931f-e771-4cdf-9fe2-bb528e1beb90
Valor, Carmen
32d819dd-443a-4a64-853e-919618ff8c45
Danae, Manika
256cd41c-6432-4e94-8497-c37fba4792b4
Wei, Liyuan
a5ebeff3-eeac-454f-b349-3ac5e50e71f1
Antonetti, Paolo
89c2931f-e771-4cdf-9fe2-bb528e1beb90
Valor, Carmen
32d819dd-443a-4a64-853e-919618ff8c45
Danae, Manika
256cd41c-6432-4e94-8497-c37fba4792b4
Wei, Liyuan
a5ebeff3-eeac-454f-b349-3ac5e50e71f1

Antonetti, Paolo, Valor, Carmen, Danae, Manika and Wei, Liyuan (2025) Traditional methods, consumers’ stereotyping of farmers and the compensatory effects of ethical food cues. European Journal of Marketing, 59 (7), 1891-1912. (doi:10.1108/EJM-10-2022-0705).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Attesting to the growing interest in ethical food, scholarship has examined how consumers respond to different cues associated with food ethicality. However, the psychological mechanisms through which ethical food cues shape consumer preferences have been overlooked. Focusing on an underexamined cue (traditional production methods) and drawing from the Stereotype Content Model, this study examines whether a warmth stereotyping of farmers may explain the influence of this cue on consumer preferences. Moreover, the paper also explores how the interaction of cues of localness and traditionality affect farmers’ perception. The paper documents compensatory effects between traditional methods and localness in specific circumstances. Two online experiments (Study 1 N = 291; Study 2 N = 183) were conducted to test the hypotheses. We manipulate farming methods and localness and measure perceptions of warmth and consumer responses to the profile of a fictitious farm. A model of moderated mediation is examined which identifies compensatory effects between traditional farming methods and perceptions of localness.
A warm stereotype of farmers explains the positive effect of traditional farming methods and localness on consumers’ food attitudes and preferences. Furthermore, different ethical cues can have a compensatory effect on consumers’ perceptions of warmth. Specifically, for consumers with strong opposition to long supply chains, the adoption of traditional farming methods compensates for the perceived warmth of geographically distant farmers. Thus, consumers who would usually dislike distant farmers retain a positive impression of them if these farmers can boast traditional farming cues. Furthermore, we find no evidence of an additive effect between traditional farming methods and localness on warmth: the addition of the two cues does not significantly increase perceptions of farmers’ warmth. The study demonstrates that the social perception of farmers plays a key role in food preferences and the perception of ethical cues in food consumption. Moreover, it shows how different cues may influence perceptions of warmth depending on consumers’ involvement.
For the promotion of ethical food systems, farmers could increase favorable consumer attitudes by foregrounding the ethical cues of localness and traditional farming methods. The results extend our understanding of the mechanisms underpinning preferences for ethical food and explicate how multiple ethical cues influence ethical food consumption.

Text
EJM_Proof-PURE-upload - Accepted Manuscript
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 7 July 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 22 August 2025
Published date: 24 September 2025
Keywords: Ethical food, Experiments, Locavorism, Persuasion, Stereotype content model, Traditional production

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 509100
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/509100
ISSN: 0309-0566
PURE UUID: afbf0dec-3f30-449d-9583-4c4f39459e38
ORCID for Liyuan Wei: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0561-1700

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Feb 2026 17:44
Last modified: 12 Feb 2026 03:27

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Paolo Antonetti
Author: Carmen Valor
Author: Manika Danae
Author: Liyuan Wei ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×