The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Protocol for a randomized clinical trial to evaluate not routinely measuring gastric residual volume to guide enteral feeding versus routine measurement in mechanically ventilated critically ill children (GASTRIC-PICU)

Protocol for a randomized clinical trial to evaluate not routinely measuring gastric residual volume to guide enteral feeding versus routine measurement in mechanically ventilated critically ill children (GASTRIC-PICU)
Protocol for a randomized clinical trial to evaluate not routinely measuring gastric residual volume to guide enteral feeding versus routine measurement in mechanically ventilated critically ill children (GASTRIC-PICU)
Objective: providing adequate nutrition is a key aspect of pediatric intensive care, with enteral administration preferred. The regular measurement of gastric residual volume (GRV) to guide feeding is common, but it results in frequent feed interruptions due to a perceived high GRV. The GASTRIC-PICU (GRV to guide enteral feeding vs. routine measurement in mechanically ventilated critically ill children) randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of not routinely measuring GRV to guide enteral feeding compared with the usual practice of routine measurement.

Design: multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority, open-label clinical trial with embedded health economic evaluation.

Setting: twenty-three PICUs across United Kingdom, Scotland, Northern Ireland, and Switzerland.

Patients: infants and children 37 weeks old or older corrected gestational age to 16 years admitted to participating PICUs, on mechanical ventilation and being enterally fed.

Intervention and Comparison: standard feeding protocols without routinely measuring GRV to guide feeding will be compared against standard feeding protocols with routine (at least 6-hourly) GRV measurement to guide feeding.

Measurements and main results: randomization 1:1 between no routine GRV measurement and routine GRV measurement stratified by site, age at admission, and main reason for admission. “Research Without Prior Consent” will be used. The primary clinical outcome is a composite outcome of survival and days free from mechanical ventilation at 30 days (non-inferiority). The superiority co-primary outcome is the percentage of the child’s estimated energy requirements achieved by 72 hours after randomization. The primary outcome of cost-effectiveness analysis is incremental net monetary benefits at 6 months. Baseline demographics and clinical status, daily nutritional data for the first 7 days, and discharge outcome, as well as longer-term survival and economic data will be collected.

Conclusions: trial findings will be disseminated in peer reviewed journals, via international conferences and in lay language via social media.
1947-3893
Orzol, Marzena
9d643924-6df7-4298-b8d5-81ef60604c66
Chang, Irene
d4868da0-542c-4838-8282-33d853a3e225
Laing, Emma
d316cf10-0f42-4fbd-8f0b-852c97081e7d
Hall, Nigel J.
6919e8af-3890-42c1-98a7-c110791957cf
et al.
Orzol, Marzena
9d643924-6df7-4298-b8d5-81ef60604c66
Chang, Irene
d4868da0-542c-4838-8282-33d853a3e225
Laing, Emma
d316cf10-0f42-4fbd-8f0b-852c97081e7d
Hall, Nigel J.
6919e8af-3890-42c1-98a7-c110791957cf

Orzol, Marzena, Chang, Irene and Laing, Emma , et al. (2026) Protocol for a randomized clinical trial to evaluate not routinely measuring gastric residual volume to guide enteral feeding versus routine measurement in mechanically ventilated critically ill children (GASTRIC-PICU). Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. (doi:10.1097/PCC.0000000000003921).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective: providing adequate nutrition is a key aspect of pediatric intensive care, with enteral administration preferred. The regular measurement of gastric residual volume (GRV) to guide feeding is common, but it results in frequent feed interruptions due to a perceived high GRV. The GASTRIC-PICU (GRV to guide enteral feeding vs. routine measurement in mechanically ventilated critically ill children) randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of not routinely measuring GRV to guide enteral feeding compared with the usual practice of routine measurement.

Design: multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority, open-label clinical trial with embedded health economic evaluation.

Setting: twenty-three PICUs across United Kingdom, Scotland, Northern Ireland, and Switzerland.

Patients: infants and children 37 weeks old or older corrected gestational age to 16 years admitted to participating PICUs, on mechanical ventilation and being enterally fed.

Intervention and Comparison: standard feeding protocols without routinely measuring GRV to guide feeding will be compared against standard feeding protocols with routine (at least 6-hourly) GRV measurement to guide feeding.

Measurements and main results: randomization 1:1 between no routine GRV measurement and routine GRV measurement stratified by site, age at admission, and main reason for admission. “Research Without Prior Consent” will be used. The primary clinical outcome is a composite outcome of survival and days free from mechanical ventilation at 30 days (non-inferiority). The superiority co-primary outcome is the percentage of the child’s estimated energy requirements achieved by 72 hours after randomization. The primary outcome of cost-effectiveness analysis is incremental net monetary benefits at 6 months. Baseline demographics and clinical status, daily nutritional data for the first 7 days, and discharge outcome, as well as longer-term survival and economic data will be collected.

Conclusions: trial findings will be disseminated in peer reviewed journals, via international conferences and in lay language via social media.

Text
GASTRIC-PICU protocol paper 09 JAN 2026 accepted word version - Accepted Manuscript
Download (100kB)
Text
Supplemental Digital File - Accepted Manuscript
Download (2MB)
Text
protocol_for_a_randomized_clinical_trial_to.631 - Version of Record
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 26 January 2026
e-pub ahead of print date: 26 February 2026

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 510644
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/510644
ISSN: 1947-3893
PURE UUID: 25c0dcac-b7b5-487e-86ed-70f8280a94f2
ORCID for Nigel J. Hall: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8570-9374

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Apr 2026 16:34
Last modified: 16 Apr 2026 01:44

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Marzena Orzol
Author: Irene Chang
Author: Emma Laing
Author: Nigel J. Hall ORCID iD
Corporate Author: et al.

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×