Cross-cultural differential item functioning in the PISA 2022 creative thinking assessment
Cross-cultural differential item functioning in the PISA 2022 creative thinking assessment
Conceptions of creativity differ systematically across cultures, shaping how they are expressed and valued. The introduction of a Creative Thinking (CT) domain in PISA 2022 marks the first large-scale, internationally comparable assessment of this competence among 15-year-olds. However, the availability of this rich cross-national data does not resolve the fundamental validity question of whether the creative thinking tasks function equivalently across diverse cultural contexts at the item level. This study investigates the extent, patterns, and mechanisms of cultural differences in the PISA 2022 CT assessment. We employ a sequential explanatory mixed-methods approach, pairing an IRT-based Differential Functioning of Items and Tests (DFIT) framework with qualitative item diagnosis. DFIT analyses of 30 PISA 2022 CT items across 10 Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness (GLOBE) cultural clusters reveal that while cultural non-invariance is pervasive (flagging 83.3% of items), the severity of bias is uneven. At the cluster level, bias does not suggest an “East–West” divide but distinct regional assessment profiles. To explain these quantitative patterns, a subsequent qualitative diagnosis of the most severely biased items was conducted. This analysis located a four-dimensional bias architecture that may contribute to the observed disadvantage: (1) context universality and familiarity, (2) the cultural match of scenario-activated cognitive prototypes, (3) implicit value assumptions, and (4) response-mode alignment. These findings call for a shift in the field from reactive, post-hoc bias screening to a proactive approach of embedding fairness considerations into the design process, aimed at creating culturally inclusive assessments.
Creative thinking, Culture, DIF, PISA
Cen, Jiayi
b7adcc8f-e64f-47f4-84e8-7598bf43ad28
Bokhove, Christian
7fc17e5b-9a94-48f3-a387-2ccf60d2d5d8
McIntyre, Nora
c9a9ecfb-10a7-4f59-b1f5-652f9db2f28f
Cen, Jiayi
b7adcc8f-e64f-47f4-84e8-7598bf43ad28
Bokhove, Christian
7fc17e5b-9a94-48f3-a387-2ccf60d2d5d8
McIntyre, Nora
c9a9ecfb-10a7-4f59-b1f5-652f9db2f28f
Cen, Jiayi, Bokhove, Christian and McIntyre, Nora
(2026)
Cross-cultural differential item functioning in the PISA 2022 creative thinking assessment.
Thinking Skills and Creativity, 61, [102210].
(doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2026.102210).
Abstract
Conceptions of creativity differ systematically across cultures, shaping how they are expressed and valued. The introduction of a Creative Thinking (CT) domain in PISA 2022 marks the first large-scale, internationally comparable assessment of this competence among 15-year-olds. However, the availability of this rich cross-national data does not resolve the fundamental validity question of whether the creative thinking tasks function equivalently across diverse cultural contexts at the item level. This study investigates the extent, patterns, and mechanisms of cultural differences in the PISA 2022 CT assessment. We employ a sequential explanatory mixed-methods approach, pairing an IRT-based Differential Functioning of Items and Tests (DFIT) framework with qualitative item diagnosis. DFIT analyses of 30 PISA 2022 CT items across 10 Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness (GLOBE) cultural clusters reveal that while cultural non-invariance is pervasive (flagging 83.3% of items), the severity of bias is uneven. At the cluster level, bias does not suggest an “East–West” divide but distinct regional assessment profiles. To explain these quantitative patterns, a subsequent qualitative diagnosis of the most severely biased items was conducted. This analysis located a four-dimensional bias architecture that may contribute to the observed disadvantage: (1) context universality and familiarity, (2) the cultural match of scenario-activated cognitive prototypes, (3) implicit value assumptions, and (4) response-mode alignment. These findings call for a shift in the field from reactive, post-hoc bias screening to a proactive approach of embedding fairness considerations into the design process, aimed at creating culturally inclusive assessments.
Text
pisa2022_creativity_dif_pure
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 25 March 2026
e-pub ahead of print date: 26 March 2026
Additional Information:
Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Author(s).
Keywords:
Creative thinking, Culture, DIF, PISA
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 511176
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/511176
ISSN: 1871-1871
PURE UUID: fecb980a-e666-4040-9a0f-73d7f870dc00
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 May 2026 17:26
Last modified: 06 May 2026 02:04
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Jiayi Cen
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics