The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Lessons learnt from long-term monitoring of river restoration in an English chalk stream

Lessons learnt from long-term monitoring of river restoration in an English chalk stream
Lessons learnt from long-term monitoring of river restoration in an English chalk stream
River restoration can be difficult to evaluate due to insufficient monitoring over timescales too short to adequately capture physical and ecological response. To better understand restoration outcomes, this study quantified changes in physical habitat (depth, velocity, substrate composition) and macroinvertebrates at two restoration projects on a chalk stream (River Test, UK) over 8–9 years using a Before-After repeated measures approach. Restoration involved coarse substrate addition, tree hinging/woody material placement and planform reprofiling. At both sites, habitat heterogeneity (e.g., cross-sectional depth variability) and macroinvertebrate abundance and diversity increased, whilst non-rheophilic taxa increased in dominance at one site. Substrate composition varied over time but generally became coarser post-restoration. Macroinvertebrate metrics remained relatively stable following restoration, except in 2016 (1- and 3-years post-restoration) when several metrics were lower (e.g., abundance and taxon richness). The reasons for this are unclear but could represent local disturbance (e.g., river management) or variability in data collection between surveyors. This study provides evidence for the effectiveness of restoration and highlights the benefits and challenges of longer-term monitoring. Considering the cost of restoration, there is a need to adequately evaluate project outcomes over the long-term to ascertain reasons for success and failure and overall cost: benefit. Equally, it is recognised that due to the small-scale of many opportunistic projects it is not economically viable to include extensive monitoring. Therefore, we recommend a strategic programme of robust, long-term appraisals be developed assessing exemplar restoration sites to evidence restoration effectiveness and guide future efforts.
ecology, groundwater river, macroinvertebrates, rehabilitation
1535-1459
Dolman, Lewis A.
86877efd-0354-4f35-8447-0945530ff6a9
Vowles, Andrew S.
c35c3a75-2199-4665-8340-e8ee7abc25f4
Kemp, Paul S.
9e33fba6-cccf-4eb5-965b-b70e72b11cd7
Dolman, Lewis A.
86877efd-0354-4f35-8447-0945530ff6a9
Vowles, Andrew S.
c35c3a75-2199-4665-8340-e8ee7abc25f4
Kemp, Paul S.
9e33fba6-cccf-4eb5-965b-b70e72b11cd7

Dolman, Lewis A., Vowles, Andrew S. and Kemp, Paul S. (2026) Lessons learnt from long-term monitoring of river restoration in an English chalk stream. River Research and Applications. (doi:10.1002/rra.70138).

Record type: Article

Abstract

River restoration can be difficult to evaluate due to insufficient monitoring over timescales too short to adequately capture physical and ecological response. To better understand restoration outcomes, this study quantified changes in physical habitat (depth, velocity, substrate composition) and macroinvertebrates at two restoration projects on a chalk stream (River Test, UK) over 8–9 years using a Before-After repeated measures approach. Restoration involved coarse substrate addition, tree hinging/woody material placement and planform reprofiling. At both sites, habitat heterogeneity (e.g., cross-sectional depth variability) and macroinvertebrate abundance and diversity increased, whilst non-rheophilic taxa increased in dominance at one site. Substrate composition varied over time but generally became coarser post-restoration. Macroinvertebrate metrics remained relatively stable following restoration, except in 2016 (1- and 3-years post-restoration) when several metrics were lower (e.g., abundance and taxon richness). The reasons for this are unclear but could represent local disturbance (e.g., river management) or variability in data collection between surveyors. This study provides evidence for the effectiveness of restoration and highlights the benefits and challenges of longer-term monitoring. Considering the cost of restoration, there is a need to adequately evaluate project outcomes over the long-term to ascertain reasons for success and failure and overall cost: benefit. Equally, it is recognised that due to the small-scale of many opportunistic projects it is not economically viable to include extensive monitoring. Therefore, we recommend a strategic programme of robust, long-term appraisals be developed assessing exemplar restoration sites to evidence restoration effectiveness and guide future efforts.

Text
2026.03.13. Dolman et al. SUBMISSION V3 - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (2MB)
Text
River Research Apps - 2026 - Dolman - Lessons Learnt From Long‐Term Monitoring of River Restoration in an English Chalk - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 20 February 2026
Published date: 4 April 2026
Keywords: ecology, groundwater river, macroinvertebrates, rehabilitation

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 511362
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/511362
ISSN: 1535-1459
PURE UUID: 31f613f7-8ab5-4dd9-958d-132d0b28d53d
ORCID for Andrew S. Vowles: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8253-5938
ORCID for Paul S. Kemp: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4470-0589

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 May 2026 16:58
Last modified: 13 May 2026 01:43

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Lewis A. Dolman
Author: Paul S. Kemp ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×