The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Assessing bettors' ability to process dynamic information: Policy implications

Johnson, J.E.V., O'Brien, R. and Sung, M. (2010) Assessing bettors' ability to process dynamic information: Policy implications Southern Economic Journal, 76, (4), pp. 906-931. (doi:10.4284/sej.2010.76.4.906).

Record type: Article


Regulation is often employed to encourage the provision of readily interpretable, explicit
information to betting markets in an effort to promote their efficiency. This approach is
supported by a considerable volume of laboratory-based research which suggests that individuals
make poor judgments in the face of implicit, dynamic information. This article investigates to
what extent horserace bettors, who have strong incentives to make good probability judgments,
require the regulator’s protection from such hostile information environments. In particular, we
examine the accuracy of the subjective probabilities of bettors concerning 16,344 horses in 1671
races. We find that bettors are skilled in adopting effective heuristics to simplify their dynamic
information environment and, even in the face of restricted information, develop well-calibrated
judgments using outcome feedback. A number of factors that help bettors to achieve good
calibration are identified and the implications for market regulation are discussed.

PDF soec-76-04-906_Sung.pdf - Other
Download (392kB)

More information

Published date: April 2010


Local EPrints ID: 64383
ISSN: 0038-4038
PURE UUID: a9d01f3a-633d-4784-bc85-8f76a47e0486

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Jan 2009
Last modified: 17 Jul 2017 14:13

Export record


Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton:

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.