A comparison of design and model selection methods for supersaturated experiments


Marley, Christopher J. and Woods, David C. (2009) A comparison of design and model selection methods for supersaturated experiments , Southampton, UK Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute 22pp. (S3RI Methodology Working Papers, M09/20).

Download

[img] PDF s3ri-workingpaper-M09-20.pdf - Other
Download (167kB)

Description/Abstract

Various design and model selection methods are available for supersatu-
rated designs having more factors than runs but little research is available on
their comparison and evaluation. In this paper, simulated experiments are
used to evaluate the use of E(s2)-optimal and Bayesian D-optimal designs,
and to compare three analysis strategies representing regression, shrinkage
and a novel model-averaging procedure. Suggestions are made for choosing
the values of the tuning constants for each approach. Findings include that
(i) the preferred analysis is via shrinkage; (ii) designs with similar numbers
of runs and factors can be effective for a considerable number of active effects
of only moderate size; and (iii) unbalanced designs can perform well. Some
comments are made on the performance of the design and analysis methods
when effect sparsity does not hold

Item Type: Monograph (Working Paper)
Subjects:
ePrint ID: 69458
Date :
Date Event
4 November 2009Submitted
Date Deposited: 17 Nov 2009
Last Modified: 18 Apr 2017 21:13
Further Information:Google Scholar
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/69458

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item