The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A comparison of two methods of estimating propensity scores after multiple imputation

Mitra, R. and Reiter, J.P. (2012) A comparison of two methods of estimating propensity scores after multiple imputation Statistical Methods in Medical Research, pp. 1-17. (doi:10.1177/0962280212445945).

Record type: Article


In many observational studies, analysts estimate treatment effects using propensity scores, e.g. by matching or sub-classifying on the scores. When some values of the covariates are missing, analysts can use multiple imputation to fill in the missing data, estimate propensity scores based on the m completed datasets, and use the propensity scores to estimate treatment effects. We compare two approaches to implement this process. In the first, the analyst estimates the treatment effect using propensity score matching within each completed data set, and averages the m treatment effect estimates. In the second approach, the analyst averages the m propensity scores for each record across the completed datasets, and performs propensity score matching with these averaged scores to estimate the treatment effect. We compare properties of both methods via simulation studies using artificial and real data. The simulations suggest that the second method has greater potential to produce substantial bias reductions than the first, particularly when the missing values are predictive of treatment assignment.

Text mitrareiter_smimrmaintext.pdf - Other
Download (455kB)
Text mitrareiter_smimronlinesupplement.pdf - Other
Download (114kB)
Text 180701MITRA10.pdf - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (376kB)

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 11 June 2012
Organisations: Statistical Sciences Research Institute, Southampton Statistical Research Inst.


Local EPrints ID: 180701
ISSN: 0962-2802
PURE UUID: 3948e9a7-2230-4669-82e6-a22892796b59

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Apr 2011 14:40
Last modified: 08 Sep 2017 16:33

Export record


Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton:

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.