The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Safety and efficacy of ozanezumab in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial

Safety and efficacy of ozanezumab in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial
Safety and efficacy of ozanezumab in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial
Background: Nogo-A is a neurite outgrowth inhibitor protein that is thought to have a role in the pathophysiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). A monoclonal antibody against Nogo-A showed a positive effect in the SOD1G93A mouse model of ALS, and a humanised form of this antibody (ozanezumab) was well tolerated in a first-in-human trial. We therefore assessed the safety and efficacy of ozanezumab in patients with ALS.

Methods: In a phase 2, double-blind study, patients with ALS were randomised in a 1:1 ratio with a computer-generated allocation schedule to receive ozanezumab (15 mg/kg) or placebo as intravenous infusions every 2 weeks for 46 weeks, followed by a week 48 assessment and a 12-week follow-up. Patients and study personnel were blinded to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was a joint-rank analysis of function (ALSFRS-R) and survival. Analysis was by modified intent to treat. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01753076 GSK-ClinicalStudyRegister.com GSK ID 1223249

Findings: The first patient was enrolled into the study on Dec 20, 2012, and the last patient visit was on Jan 22, 2015. 303 patients were randomly assigned to the placebo group (n=151) or ozanezumab (n=152). The joint-rank score indicated a non-significant difference in favour of placebo (adjusted placebo mean 15·0[SE 13·58] vs ozanezumab mean –14·9 [SE 13·54], with least squares mean difference –30·0 [95% CI –67·9 to 7·9]; p=0·120). The incidences of dyspepsia (7% vs 3%), depression (7% vs 3%), and diarrhoea (16% vs 8%) in the ozanezumab group were almost twice those in the placebo group. A numerically higher incidence of fatal SAEs was observed with ozanezumab versus placebo (18 [12%] vs 13 [9%] deaths), driven mainly by respiratory failure events (ten [7%] vs five [3%]). Respiratory failure was the most common SAE, reported in 12 (8%) and seven (5%) patients in the ozanezumab and placebo arms, respectively.

Interpretation: Ozanezumab did not demonstrate efficacy compared with placebo in patients with ALS. Therefore, Nogo-A does not seem to be an effective therapeutic target in ALS.

Funding: GlaxoSmithKline.
208-216
Meininger, Vincent
4ef2fc73-06e8-4f36-83ce-51d5eb972103
Genge, Angela
3d73ffa8-0b3f-40f0-8dbc-de841ce2a1d2
van den Berg, Leonard
be593907-70e2-4a69-b7ce-40fe1f8fcb33
Morrison, Karen
f00890f0-2fde-4dbd-a73b-7422e1b0ede8
NOG112264 Study Group
et al.
Meininger, Vincent
4ef2fc73-06e8-4f36-83ce-51d5eb972103
Genge, Angela
3d73ffa8-0b3f-40f0-8dbc-de841ce2a1d2
van den Berg, Leonard
be593907-70e2-4a69-b7ce-40fe1f8fcb33
Morrison, Karen
f00890f0-2fde-4dbd-a73b-7422e1b0ede8

Meininger, Vincent, Genge, Angela and van den Berg, Leonard , NOG112264 Study Group and et al. (2017) Safety and efficacy of ozanezumab in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. The Lancet Neurology, 16 (3), 208-216. (doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30399-4).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Nogo-A is a neurite outgrowth inhibitor protein that is thought to have a role in the pathophysiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). A monoclonal antibody against Nogo-A showed a positive effect in the SOD1G93A mouse model of ALS, and a humanised form of this antibody (ozanezumab) was well tolerated in a first-in-human trial. We therefore assessed the safety and efficacy of ozanezumab in patients with ALS.

Methods: In a phase 2, double-blind study, patients with ALS were randomised in a 1:1 ratio with a computer-generated allocation schedule to receive ozanezumab (15 mg/kg) or placebo as intravenous infusions every 2 weeks for 46 weeks, followed by a week 48 assessment and a 12-week follow-up. Patients and study personnel were blinded to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was a joint-rank analysis of function (ALSFRS-R) and survival. Analysis was by modified intent to treat. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01753076 GSK-ClinicalStudyRegister.com GSK ID 1223249

Findings: The first patient was enrolled into the study on Dec 20, 2012, and the last patient visit was on Jan 22, 2015. 303 patients were randomly assigned to the placebo group (n=151) or ozanezumab (n=152). The joint-rank score indicated a non-significant difference in favour of placebo (adjusted placebo mean 15·0[SE 13·58] vs ozanezumab mean –14·9 [SE 13·54], with least squares mean difference –30·0 [95% CI –67·9 to 7·9]; p=0·120). The incidences of dyspepsia (7% vs 3%), depression (7% vs 3%), and diarrhoea (16% vs 8%) in the ozanezumab group were almost twice those in the placebo group. A numerically higher incidence of fatal SAEs was observed with ozanezumab versus placebo (18 [12%] vs 13 [9%] deaths), driven mainly by respiratory failure events (ten [7%] vs five [3%]). Respiratory failure was the most common SAE, reported in 12 (8%) and seven (5%) patients in the ozanezumab and placebo arms, respectively.

Interpretation: Ozanezumab did not demonstrate efficacy compared with placebo in patients with ALS. Therefore, Nogo-A does not seem to be an effective therapeutic target in ALS.

Funding: GlaxoSmithKline.

Text
RESUBMISSION DRAFT - Accepted Manuscript
Download (90kB)
Text
Supplementary methods - Accepted Manuscript
Download (47kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 4 January 2017
e-pub ahead of print date: 28 January 2017
Published date: March 2017
Organisations: Faculty of Medicine

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 404894
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/404894
PURE UUID: 89fd24fe-c758-4f73-8a9e-c593a2eab367
ORCID for Karen Morrison: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0216-5717

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 Jan 2017 16:32
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 06:15

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Vincent Meininger
Author: Angela Genge
Author: Leonard van den Berg
Author: Karen Morrison ORCID iD
Corporate Author: NOG112264 Study Group
Corporate Author: et al.

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×