Multisite musculoskeletal pain in migrants from the Indian subcontinent to the UK: a cross-sectional survey
Multisite musculoskeletal pain in migrants from the Indian subcontinent to the UK: a cross-sectional survey
Background
Recent findings indicate that wide international variation in the prevalence of disabling regional musculoskeletal pain among working populations is driven by unidentified factors predisposing to pain at multiple anatomical sites. As a step towards identification of those factors, it would be helpful to know whether the prevalence of multisite pain changes when people migrate between countries with differing rates of symptoms; and if so, whether the change is apparent in first generation migrants, and by what age it becomes manifest.
Methods
To address these questions, we analysed data from an earlier interview-based cross-sectional survey, which assessed the prevalence of musculoskeletal pain and risk factors in six groups of workers distinguished by the nature of their work (non-manual or manual) and their country of residence and ethnicity (UK white, UK of Indian subcontinental origin and Indian in India). Prevalence odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by logistic regression.
Results
Among 814 participants (response rate 95.4%), 20.6% reported pain at ≥3 anatomical sites. This outcome was much less frequent in Indian manual workers than among white non-manual workers in the UK (adjusted OR 0.06, 95%CI 0.01-0.36), while rates in Indian non-manual workers were intermediate (OR 0.29, 95%CI 0.12-0.72). However, within the UK, there were only small differences between white non-manual workers and the other occupational groups, including those of Indian sub-continental origin. This applied even when analysis was restricted to participants aged 17 to 34 years, and when second and later generation migrants were excluded
Conclusions
The observed differences in the prevalence of multisite pain seem too large to be explained by healthy worker selection or errors in recall, and there was no indication of bias from differences in understanding of the term, pain. Our findings suggest that whatever drives the higher prevalence of musculoskeletal pain in the UK than India is environmental rather than genetic, affects multiple anatomical sites, begins to act by fairly early in adult life, and has impact soon after people move from India to the UK.
1-7
Rizzello, E.
24be4e33-b40a-445a-abec-e8f585d49c86
Ntani, Georgia
9b009e0a-5ab2-4c6e-a9fd-15a601e92be5
Madan, Ira
c6fd0de4-6d73-47eb-9e97-79a2941c8767
Coggon, David
121cc098-fb7b-4a7e-971a-72b4b263d79b
28 March 2019
Rizzello, E.
24be4e33-b40a-445a-abec-e8f585d49c86
Ntani, Georgia
9b009e0a-5ab2-4c6e-a9fd-15a601e92be5
Madan, Ira
c6fd0de4-6d73-47eb-9e97-79a2941c8767
Coggon, David
121cc098-fb7b-4a7e-971a-72b4b263d79b
Rizzello, E., Ntani, Georgia, Madan, Ira and Coggon, David
(2019)
Multisite musculoskeletal pain in migrants from the Indian subcontinent to the UK: a cross-sectional survey.
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 20 (133), .
(doi:10.1186/s12891-019-2494-3).
Abstract
Background
Recent findings indicate that wide international variation in the prevalence of disabling regional musculoskeletal pain among working populations is driven by unidentified factors predisposing to pain at multiple anatomical sites. As a step towards identification of those factors, it would be helpful to know whether the prevalence of multisite pain changes when people migrate between countries with differing rates of symptoms; and if so, whether the change is apparent in first generation migrants, and by what age it becomes manifest.
Methods
To address these questions, we analysed data from an earlier interview-based cross-sectional survey, which assessed the prevalence of musculoskeletal pain and risk factors in six groups of workers distinguished by the nature of their work (non-manual or manual) and their country of residence and ethnicity (UK white, UK of Indian subcontinental origin and Indian in India). Prevalence odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by logistic regression.
Results
Among 814 participants (response rate 95.4%), 20.6% reported pain at ≥3 anatomical sites. This outcome was much less frequent in Indian manual workers than among white non-manual workers in the UK (adjusted OR 0.06, 95%CI 0.01-0.36), while rates in Indian non-manual workers were intermediate (OR 0.29, 95%CI 0.12-0.72). However, within the UK, there were only small differences between white non-manual workers and the other occupational groups, including those of Indian sub-continental origin. This applied even when analysis was restricted to participants aged 17 to 34 years, and when second and later generation migrants were excluded
Conclusions
The observed differences in the prevalence of multisite pain seem too large to be explained by healthy worker selection or errors in recall, and there was no indication of bias from differences in understanding of the term, pain. Our findings suggest that whatever drives the higher prevalence of musculoskeletal pain in the UK than India is environmental rather than genetic, affects multiple anatomical sites, begins to act by fairly early in adult life, and has impact soon after people move from India to the UK.
Text
Pain propensity in India and UK (untracked) 190227 (00000002)
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
s12891-019-2494-3
- Version of Record
Text
Fig 1 190208 (00000002)
Show all 6 downloads.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 5 March 2019
Published date: 28 March 2019
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 429851
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/429851
ISSN: 1471-2474
PURE UUID: fe8dc8cc-2651-4fba-b27f-94000ec0bd04
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 08 Apr 2019 16:30
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 01:15
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
E. Rizzello
Author:
Ira Madan
Author:
David Coggon
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics