Derivation and performance of standardized enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) test thresholds for the detection and prognosis of liver fibrosis
Derivation and performance of standardized enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) test thresholds for the detection and prognosis of liver fibrosis
Introduction
Noninvasive tests are increasingly used to assess liver fibrosis and determine prognosis but suggested test thresholds vary. We describe the selection of standardized thresholds for the Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) test for the detection of liver fibrosis and for prognostication in chronic liver disease.
Methods
A Delphi method was used to identify thresholds for the ELF test to predict histological liver fibrosis stages, including cirrhosis, using data derived from 921 patients in the EUROGOLF cohort. These thresholds were then used to determine the prognostic performance of ELF in a subset of 457 patients followed for a mean of 5 years.
Results
The Delphi panel selected sensitivity of 85% for the detection of fibrosis and >95% specificity for cirrhosis. The corresponding thresholds were 7.7, 9.8, and 11.3. Eighty-five percent of patients with mild or worse fibrosis had an ELF score ≥7.7. The sensitivity for cirrhosis of ELF ≥9.8 was 76%. ELF ≥11.3 was 97% specific for cirrhosis. ELF scores show a near-linear relationship with Ishak fibrosis stages. Relative to the <7.7 group, the hazard ratios for a liver-related outcome at 5 years were 21.00 (95% CI, 2.68–164.65) and 71.04 (95% CI, 9.4–536.7) in the 9.8 to <11.3 and ≥11.3 subgroups, respectively.
Conclusion
The selection of standard thresholds for detection and prognosis of liver fibrosis is described and their performance reported. These thresholds should prove useful in both interpreting and explaining test results and when considering the relationship of ELF score to Ishak stage in the context of monitoring.
815-826
Day, James
a1cae352-a4de-4a37-af5a-68530a87a99e
Patel, Preya
d5de8f51-e449-4a0a-8b54-0c4cedccd8a8
Parkes, Julie
59dc6de3-4018-415e-bb99-13552f97e984
Rosenberg, William M
145ebec3-ffb6-45e7-8711-aa520ed42f55
Day, James
a1cae352-a4de-4a37-af5a-68530a87a99e
Patel, Preya
d5de8f51-e449-4a0a-8b54-0c4cedccd8a8
Parkes, Julie
59dc6de3-4018-415e-bb99-13552f97e984
Rosenberg, William M
145ebec3-ffb6-45e7-8711-aa520ed42f55
Day, James, Patel, Preya, Parkes, Julie and Rosenberg, William M
(2019)
Derivation and performance of standardized enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) test thresholds for the detection and prognosis of liver fibrosis.
The Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine, 3 (5), .
(doi:10.1373/jalm.2018.027359).
Abstract
Introduction
Noninvasive tests are increasingly used to assess liver fibrosis and determine prognosis but suggested test thresholds vary. We describe the selection of standardized thresholds for the Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) test for the detection of liver fibrosis and for prognostication in chronic liver disease.
Methods
A Delphi method was used to identify thresholds for the ELF test to predict histological liver fibrosis stages, including cirrhosis, using data derived from 921 patients in the EUROGOLF cohort. These thresholds were then used to determine the prognostic performance of ELF in a subset of 457 patients followed for a mean of 5 years.
Results
The Delphi panel selected sensitivity of 85% for the detection of fibrosis and >95% specificity for cirrhosis. The corresponding thresholds were 7.7, 9.8, and 11.3. Eighty-five percent of patients with mild or worse fibrosis had an ELF score ≥7.7. The sensitivity for cirrhosis of ELF ≥9.8 was 76%. ELF ≥11.3 was 97% specific for cirrhosis. ELF scores show a near-linear relationship with Ishak fibrosis stages. Relative to the <7.7 group, the hazard ratios for a liver-related outcome at 5 years were 21.00 (95% CI, 2.68–164.65) and 71.04 (95% CI, 9.4–536.7) in the 9.8 to <11.3 and ≥11.3 subgroups, respectively.
Conclusion
The selection of standard thresholds for detection and prognosis of liver fibrosis is described and their performance reported. These thresholds should prove useful in both interpreting and explaining test results and when considering the relationship of ELF score to Ishak stage in the context of monitoring.
Text
Thresholds JALM_revised_V3Acc
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
Figure 1
- Accepted Manuscript
Slideshow
Figure 2
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
jalm day parkes biomarkers
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 15 August 2018
e-pub ahead of print date: 23 October 2019
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 437047
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/437047
ISSN: 2475-7241
PURE UUID: 1ceaf40c-5148-4fe7-b2a7-52210c6a4a7f
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 16 Jan 2020 17:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 05:14
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
James Day
Author:
Preya Patel
Author:
William M Rosenberg
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics