The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Breast cancer risk factors and survival by tumour subtype: pooled analyses from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium

Breast cancer risk factors and survival by tumour subtype: pooled analyses from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium
Breast cancer risk factors and survival by tumour subtype: pooled analyses from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium
Background: It is not known whether modifiable lifestyle factors that predict survival after invasive breast cancer differ by subtype. Methods: We analyzed data for 121,435 women diagnosed with breast cancer from 67 studies in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium with 16,890 deaths (8,554 breast cancer specific) over 10 years. Cox regression was used to estimate associations between risk factors and 10-year all-cause mortality and breast cancer-specific mortality overall, by estrogen receptor (ER) status, and by intrinsic-like subtype. Results: There was no evidence of heterogeneous associations between risk factors and mortality by subtype (P adj > 0.30). The strongest associations were between all-cause mortality and BMI ≥30 versus 18.5-25 kg/m2 [HR (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19 (1.06-1.34)]; current versus never smoking [1.37 (1.27-1.47)], high versus low physical activity [0.43 (0.21-0.86)], age ≥30 years versus <20 years at first pregnancy [0.79 (0.72-0.86)]; >0-<5 years versus ≥10 years since last full-term birth [1.31 (1.11-1.55)]; ever versus never use of oral contraceptives [0.91 (0.87-0.96)]; ever versus never use of menopausal hormone therapy, including current estrogen-progestin therapy [0.61 (0.54-0.69)]. Similar associations with breast cancer mortality were weaker; for example, 1.11 (1.02-1.21) for current versus never smoking. Conclusions: We confirm associations between modifiable lifestyle factors and 10-year all-cause mortality. There was no strong evidence that associations differed by ER status or intrinsic-like subtype. Impact: Given the large dataset and lack of evidence that associations between modifiable risk factors and 10-year mortality differed by subtype, these associations could be cautiously used in prognostication models to inform patient-centered care.
1055-9965
623-642
Morra, Anna
b866cd70-d637-40ab-8fce-fa78a04a9417
Jung, Audrey Y.
74465ea8-5494-4474-b290-acf6631095ed
Behrens, Sabine
5beaa55d-a129-413d-b3db-bc37233dc5c0
Eccles, Diana
5b59bc73-11c9-4cf0-a9d5-7a8e523eee23
et al.
Breast Cancer Association Consortium
Morra, Anna
b866cd70-d637-40ab-8fce-fa78a04a9417
Jung, Audrey Y.
74465ea8-5494-4474-b290-acf6631095ed
Behrens, Sabine
5beaa55d-a129-413d-b3db-bc37233dc5c0
Eccles, Diana
5b59bc73-11c9-4cf0-a9d5-7a8e523eee23

Morra, Anna, Jung, Audrey Y. and Behrens, Sabine , et al. and Breast Cancer Association Consortium (2021) Breast cancer risk factors and survival by tumour subtype: pooled analyses from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 30 (4), 623-642. (doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0924).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: It is not known whether modifiable lifestyle factors that predict survival after invasive breast cancer differ by subtype. Methods: We analyzed data for 121,435 women diagnosed with breast cancer from 67 studies in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium with 16,890 deaths (8,554 breast cancer specific) over 10 years. Cox regression was used to estimate associations between risk factors and 10-year all-cause mortality and breast cancer-specific mortality overall, by estrogen receptor (ER) status, and by intrinsic-like subtype. Results: There was no evidence of heterogeneous associations between risk factors and mortality by subtype (P adj > 0.30). The strongest associations were between all-cause mortality and BMI ≥30 versus 18.5-25 kg/m2 [HR (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19 (1.06-1.34)]; current versus never smoking [1.37 (1.27-1.47)], high versus low physical activity [0.43 (0.21-0.86)], age ≥30 years versus <20 years at first pregnancy [0.79 (0.72-0.86)]; >0-<5 years versus ≥10 years since last full-term birth [1.31 (1.11-1.55)]; ever versus never use of oral contraceptives [0.91 (0.87-0.96)]; ever versus never use of menopausal hormone therapy, including current estrogen-progestin therapy [0.61 (0.54-0.69)]. Similar associations with breast cancer mortality were weaker; for example, 1.11 (1.02-1.21) for current versus never smoking. Conclusions: We confirm associations between modifiable lifestyle factors and 10-year all-cause mortality. There was no strong evidence that associations differed by ER status or intrinsic-like subtype. Impact: Given the large dataset and lack of evidence that associations between modifiable risk factors and 10-year mortality differed by subtype, these associations could be cautiously used in prognostication models to inform patient-centered care.

Text
Morra_Jung_BCAC_riskfactors_survival_by_subtype - Accepted Manuscript
Download (148kB)
Text
Morra_Jung_BCAC_riskfactors_survival_by_subtype_R3_marked_CEBP_accepted - Accepted Manuscript
Download (282kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 8 January 2021
e-pub ahead of print date: 26 January 2021
Published date: 1 April 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 445631
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/445631
ISSN: 1055-9965
PURE UUID: 711fc7f7-873e-48e9-9c83-4006a7ecf751
ORCID for Diana Eccles: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9935-3169

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Jan 2021 17:33
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 06:10

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Anna Morra
Author: Audrey Y. Jung
Author: Sabine Behrens
Author: Diana Eccles ORCID iD
Corporate Author: et al.
Corporate Author: Breast Cancer Association Consortium

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×