The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Exploring the relationship between women’s experience of postnatal care and reported staffing measures: An observational study

Exploring the relationship between women’s experience of postnatal care and reported staffing measures: An observational study
Exploring the relationship between women’s experience of postnatal care and reported staffing measures: An observational study

Background: Women have reported dissatisfaction with care received on postnatal wards and this area has been highlighted for improvement. Studies have shown an association between midwifery staffing levels and postnatal care experiences, but so far, the influence of registered and support staff deployed in postnatal wards has not been studied. This work is timely as the number of support workers has increased in the workforce and there has been little research on skill mix to date. 

Methods: Cross sectional secondary analysis including 13,264 women from 123 postnatal wards within 93 hospital Trusts. Staffing was measured in each organisation as Full Time Equivalent staff employed per 100 births, and on postnatal wards, using Hours Per Patient Day. Women’s experiences were assessed using four items from the 2019 national maternity survey. Multilevel logistic regression models were used to examine relationships and adjust for maternal age, parity, ethnicity, type of birth, and medical staff. Results Trusts with higher levels of midwifery staffing had higher rates of women reporting positive experiences of postnatal care. However, looking at staffing on postnatal wards, there was no evidence of an association between registered nurses and midwives hours per patient day and patient experience. Wards with higher levels of support worker staffing were associated with higher rates of women reporting they had help when they needed it and were treated with kindness and understanding.

 Conclusion: The relationship between reported registered staffing levels on postnatal wards and women’s experience is uncertain. Further work should be carried out to examine why relationships observed using whole Trust staffing were not replicated closer to the patient, with reported postnatal ward staffing. It is possible that recorded staffing levels on postnatal wards do not actually reflect staff deployment if midwives are floated to cover delivery units. This study highlights the potential contribution of support workers in providing quality care on postnatal wards.

1932-6203
Turner, Lesley
7c4a1fe5-21a1-4634-a1cc-0230322603d1
Ball, Jane
85ac7d7a-b21e-42fd-858b-78d263c559c1
Culliford, David
25511573-74d3-422a-b0ee-dfe60f80df87
Kitson-reynolds, Ellen
fb705ade-b899-40c9-9a48-6f44fee9d385
Griffiths, Peter
4689c22e-33f4-4163-898b-a97281c08e74
Baradaran, Hamid Reza
e327898d-027a-4c39-af1e-b53d72f1e10d
Turner, Lesley
7c4a1fe5-21a1-4634-a1cc-0230322603d1
Ball, Jane
85ac7d7a-b21e-42fd-858b-78d263c559c1
Culliford, David
25511573-74d3-422a-b0ee-dfe60f80df87
Kitson-reynolds, Ellen
fb705ade-b899-40c9-9a48-6f44fee9d385
Griffiths, Peter
4689c22e-33f4-4163-898b-a97281c08e74
Baradaran, Hamid Reza
e327898d-027a-4c39-af1e-b53d72f1e10d

Turner, Lesley, Ball, Jane, Culliford, David, Kitson-reynolds, Ellen and Griffiths, Peter , Baradaran, Hamid Reza (ed.) (2022) Exploring the relationship between women’s experience of postnatal care and reported staffing measures: An observational study. PLoS ONE, 17 (8), [e0266638]. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0266638).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Women have reported dissatisfaction with care received on postnatal wards and this area has been highlighted for improvement. Studies have shown an association between midwifery staffing levels and postnatal care experiences, but so far, the influence of registered and support staff deployed in postnatal wards has not been studied. This work is timely as the number of support workers has increased in the workforce and there has been little research on skill mix to date. 

Methods: Cross sectional secondary analysis including 13,264 women from 123 postnatal wards within 93 hospital Trusts. Staffing was measured in each organisation as Full Time Equivalent staff employed per 100 births, and on postnatal wards, using Hours Per Patient Day. Women’s experiences were assessed using four items from the 2019 national maternity survey. Multilevel logistic regression models were used to examine relationships and adjust for maternal age, parity, ethnicity, type of birth, and medical staff. Results Trusts with higher levels of midwifery staffing had higher rates of women reporting positive experiences of postnatal care. However, looking at staffing on postnatal wards, there was no evidence of an association between registered nurses and midwives hours per patient day and patient experience. Wards with higher levels of support worker staffing were associated with higher rates of women reporting they had help when they needed it and were treated with kindness and understanding.

 Conclusion: The relationship between reported registered staffing levels on postnatal wards and women’s experience is uncertain. Further work should be carried out to examine why relationships observed using whole Trust staffing were not replicated closer to the patient, with reported postnatal ward staffing. It is possible that recorded staffing levels on postnatal wards do not actually reflect staff deployment if midwives are floated to cover delivery units. This study highlights the potential contribution of support workers in providing quality care on postnatal wards.

Text
Manuscript - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (126kB)
Text
journal.pone.0266638 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (439kB)
Archive
Supplementary material compressed
Download (2MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 20 July 2022
Published date: 2 August 2022

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 473275
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/473275
ISSN: 1932-6203
PURE UUID: 8e42126c-dd98-4214-a0f9-061da4b98685
ORCID for Lesley Turner: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1489-3471
ORCID for Jane Ball: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8655-2994
ORCID for David Culliford: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1663-0253

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 13 Jan 2023 17:38
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:57

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Lesley Turner ORCID iD
Author: Jane Ball ORCID iD
Author: David Culliford ORCID iD
Author: Ellen Kitson-reynolds
Author: Peter Griffiths
Editor: Hamid Reza Baradaran

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×