Surface properties influence marine biofilm rheology, with implications for ship drag
Surface properties influence marine biofilm rheology, with implications for ship drag
Marine biofilms on ship hulls increase frictional drag, which has economic and environmental consequences. It is hypothesised that biofilm mechanics, such as viscoelasticity, play a critical role in biofilm-associated drag, yet is a poorly studied area. The current study aimed to rheologically characterise ship-relevant marine biofilms. To combat marine biofilms on ship hulls, fouling-control coatings are often applied; therefore, the effect of different surfaces on marine biofilm mechanics was also investigated. Three surfaces were tested: a non-biocidal, chemically inert foul-release coating (FRC), an inert primer (ACP) and inert PVC. Physical properties of biofilms were explored using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and a parallel-plate rheometer was used for rheological testing. Image analysis revealed differences in the thickness, roughness, and percent coverage between the different biofilms. Rheological testing showed that marine biofilms, grown on FRC and ACP acted as viscoelastic materials, although there were differences. FRC biofilms had a lower shear modulus, a higher viscosity, and a higher yield stress than the ACP biofilms, suggesting that the FRC biofilms were more readily deformable but potentially more robust. The results confirmed that surface treatment influences the structural and mechanical properties of ship-relevant marine biofilms, which could have implications for drag. A better understanding of how different surface treatments affect marine biofilm rheology is required to improve our knowledge on biofilm fluid-structure interactions and to better inform the coating industry of strategies to control biofilm formation and reduce drag.
3675-3687
Snowdon, Alexandra A.
12d3e8c5-fd0d-43c3-8914-8685f0f68d27
Dennington, Simon P.
6a329a55-8c10-4515-8920-d8f40f302221
Longyear, Jennifer E.
106d207b-f9b7-4942-8e2a-5146bca27ad4
Wharton, Julian A.
965a38fd-d2bc-4a19-a08c-2d4e036aa96b
Stoodley, Paul
08614665-92a9-4466-806e-20c6daeb483f
2 May 2023
Snowdon, Alexandra A.
12d3e8c5-fd0d-43c3-8914-8685f0f68d27
Dennington, Simon P.
6a329a55-8c10-4515-8920-d8f40f302221
Longyear, Jennifer E.
106d207b-f9b7-4942-8e2a-5146bca27ad4
Wharton, Julian A.
965a38fd-d2bc-4a19-a08c-2d4e036aa96b
Stoodley, Paul
08614665-92a9-4466-806e-20c6daeb483f
Snowdon, Alexandra A., Dennington, Simon P., Longyear, Jennifer E., Wharton, Julian A. and Stoodley, Paul
(2023)
Surface properties influence marine biofilm rheology, with implications for ship drag.
Soft Matter, 19 (20), .
(doi:10.1039/D2SM01647H).
Abstract
Marine biofilms on ship hulls increase frictional drag, which has economic and environmental consequences. It is hypothesised that biofilm mechanics, such as viscoelasticity, play a critical role in biofilm-associated drag, yet is a poorly studied area. The current study aimed to rheologically characterise ship-relevant marine biofilms. To combat marine biofilms on ship hulls, fouling-control coatings are often applied; therefore, the effect of different surfaces on marine biofilm mechanics was also investigated. Three surfaces were tested: a non-biocidal, chemically inert foul-release coating (FRC), an inert primer (ACP) and inert PVC. Physical properties of biofilms were explored using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and a parallel-plate rheometer was used for rheological testing. Image analysis revealed differences in the thickness, roughness, and percent coverage between the different biofilms. Rheological testing showed that marine biofilms, grown on FRC and ACP acted as viscoelastic materials, although there were differences. FRC biofilms had a lower shear modulus, a higher viscosity, and a higher yield stress than the ACP biofilms, suggesting that the FRC biofilms were more readily deformable but potentially more robust. The results confirmed that surface treatment influences the structural and mechanical properties of ship-relevant marine biofilms, which could have implications for drag. A better understanding of how different surface treatments affect marine biofilm rheology is required to improve our knowledge on biofilm fluid-structure interactions and to better inform the coating industry of strategies to control biofilm formation and reduce drag.
Text
ASnowdon_MarineBiofilmViscoelasticity_CleanResubmission
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
d2sm01647h
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 28 April 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 2 May 2023
Published date: 2 May 2023
Additional Information:
Funding Information:
This work was funded by a DTP ESPRC grant EP/R513325/1 to the University of Southampton and AkzoNobel. The authors would like to thank Dr Alistair Finnie for editorial review.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 477496
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/477496
ISSN: 1744-683X
PURE UUID: e5fff392-1896-412d-baed-cc315d68c710
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 07 Jun 2023 16:50
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:18
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Alexandra A. Snowdon
Author:
Jennifer E. Longyear
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics