The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Training for the safe activation of Automated Vehicles matters: Revealing the benefits of online training to creating glaringly better mental models and behaviour

Training for the safe activation of Automated Vehicles matters: Revealing the benefits of online training to creating glaringly better mental models and behaviour
Training for the safe activation of Automated Vehicles matters: Revealing the benefits of online training to creating glaringly better mental models and behaviour
Automated Vehicle (AV) systems are expected to reduce the frequency and severity of on-road collisions. Unless drivers have an appropriate mental model for the capabilities and limitations of the automation, they may not activate the automation safely or appropriately on the road, potentially leading to a collision. As such, a training package (L4DTP) was developed to improve drivers’ decisions and behaviour when activating an AV system and this was evaluated in a between-subjects simulator experiment. Drivers received no training (NT, control group), read an owner’s manual (OM, experimental group 1: current training provision) or underwent the L4DTP (experimental group 2: new training programme). All drivers then experienced five scenarios in a driving simulator where they encountered road conditions which were safe and unsafe for activation. Their activation decisions, behaviour, trust in automation, workload and mental models were measured. This experiment found that drivers who read the OM or underwent the L4DTP made better activation decisions and showed better activation behaviour compared to drivers who received NT. Additionally, drivers who underwent the L4DTP found it easier, less demanding and felt under less time pressure when making their decisions, had to expend less effort to reach the same activation performance and had more appropriate and comprehensive mental models for when the automation can be activated compared to drivers who read the OM. This L4DTP can make roads safer by reducing collisions linked to poor activation decisions and behaviour. Therefore, there is the potential for a real benefit for society if this training programme is adopted into mandatory AV driver training.
automated vehicles, driver training, mental demand, mental models, trust in automation, workload, Trust in automation, Mental demand, Automated vehicles, Driver training, Mental models, Workload
0003-6870
Merriman, Siobhan
93bd85cd-f5a1-4b2c-96f5-7f1df776d07a
Revell, Kirsten
e80fedfc-3022-45b5-bcea-5a19d5d28ea0
Plant, Katherine
3638555a-f2ca-4539-962c-422686518a78
Merriman, Siobhan
93bd85cd-f5a1-4b2c-96f5-7f1df776d07a
Revell, Kirsten
e80fedfc-3022-45b5-bcea-5a19d5d28ea0
Plant, Katherine
3638555a-f2ca-4539-962c-422686518a78

Merriman, Siobhan, Revell, Kirsten and Plant, Katherine (2023) Training for the safe activation of Automated Vehicles matters: Revealing the benefits of online training to creating glaringly better mental models and behaviour. Applied Ergonomics, 112, [104057]. (doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104057).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Automated Vehicle (AV) systems are expected to reduce the frequency and severity of on-road collisions. Unless drivers have an appropriate mental model for the capabilities and limitations of the automation, they may not activate the automation safely or appropriately on the road, potentially leading to a collision. As such, a training package (L4DTP) was developed to improve drivers’ decisions and behaviour when activating an AV system and this was evaluated in a between-subjects simulator experiment. Drivers received no training (NT, control group), read an owner’s manual (OM, experimental group 1: current training provision) or underwent the L4DTP (experimental group 2: new training programme). All drivers then experienced five scenarios in a driving simulator where they encountered road conditions which were safe and unsafe for activation. Their activation decisions, behaviour, trust in automation, workload and mental models were measured. This experiment found that drivers who read the OM or underwent the L4DTP made better activation decisions and showed better activation behaviour compared to drivers who received NT. Additionally, drivers who underwent the L4DTP found it easier, less demanding and felt under less time pressure when making their decisions, had to expend less effort to reach the same activation performance and had more appropriate and comprehensive mental models for when the automation can be activated compared to drivers who read the OM. This L4DTP can make roads safer by reducing collisions linked to poor activation decisions and behaviour. Therefore, there is the potential for a real benefit for society if this training programme is adopted into mandatory AV driver training.

Text
Training for the safe activation of AVs matters paper Pure upload - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (5MB)
Text
1-s2.0-S0003687023000959-main - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (8MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 27 May 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 6 June 2023
Published date: 1 October 2023
Additional Information: Funding Information: This research was funded by IAM RoadSmart and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council . These funders had no involvement in the study design, in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data, in the writing of the report, and in the decision to submit this paper for publication. Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Authors
Keywords: automated vehicles, driver training, mental demand, mental models, trust in automation, workload, Trust in automation, Mental demand, Automated vehicles, Driver training, Mental models, Workload

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 477549
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/477549
ISSN: 0003-6870
PURE UUID: b54d26e1-56b0-4884-a0a5-f4c5e48a159c
ORCID for Siobhan Merriman: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0519-687X
ORCID for Katherine Plant: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4532-2818

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Jun 2023 16:40
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:16

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Siobhan Merriman ORCID iD
Author: Kirsten Revell
Author: Katherine Plant ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×