The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Adhesives for medical application - peel strength testing and evaluation of biophysical skin response

Adhesives for medical application - peel strength testing and evaluation of biophysical skin response
Adhesives for medical application - peel strength testing and evaluation of biophysical skin response

Background: medical adhesives are commonly used for securing wound dressings and medical devices used for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes. Mechanical irritation of skin due to adhesive stripping and repeated application can lead to discomfort and device removal. This study aims to examine the peel strength and skin response to different medical adhesives in a cohort of healthy volunteers.

Method: twelve healthy participants were recruited for peel strength testing of three candidate adhesive tapes, and evaluation of the skin response after adhesive removal. A modified ASTM D903 peel strength testing was performed at 180° peeling angle and a rate of 300 mm/min on the forehead, upper back and forearm skin. A longitudinal study was conducted on the forearm and back, with the adhesive samples left in-situ for up to 60 h for analysis of repeat application. The effects of two skin preparation approaches (water and alcohol cleaning) prior to adhesive application were also assessed. Skin biophysical properties were assessed at baseline and at various timepoints following adhesive removal using transepidermal water loss (TEWL), erythema and hydration.

Results: peel strength reduced uniformly with repeat application over prolonged periods for all the adhesive samples tested. Skin preparation with water and alcohol cleansing prior to adhesive application increased peel strength at both the back (1.1% and 2.9%), and forearm (21.3% and 20%) sites. There was statistically significant increase from baseline to post-tape application for TEWL, skin redness and hydration (p < 0.001). However, there were no statistically significant differences between adhesive types (TEWL: p = 0.38, SR: p = 0.53, HY: p = 0.46). TEWL increased the most post-adhesion across all test sites and adhesive samples with repeat application (p < 0.05). Two-way ANOVA tests revealed no statistically significant interactions between the effects of application duration and adhesive on skin redness or TEWL for both the back and forearm sites (p > 0.05), though a significant interaction was indicted for hydration at the back site (p = 0.01).

Conclusion: this study revealed that site and duration of adhesive application effected peel strength. The corresponding changes in skin properties identified that skin barrier function was disrupted with long-term application of adhesives. The back site was identified to be most reliable for adhesion testing and skin response assessment for future work.

Medical adhesives, Peel strength, Repeat application, Skin preparation, Skin response
1751-6161
Mbithi, Florence
6bf4f420-1a97-4096-b73b-6ffc02b76a21
Worsley, Peter R.
6d33aee3-ef43-468d-aef6-86d190de6756
Mbithi, Florence
6bf4f420-1a97-4096-b73b-6ffc02b76a21
Worsley, Peter R.
6d33aee3-ef43-468d-aef6-86d190de6756

Mbithi, Florence and Worsley, Peter R. (2023) Adhesives for medical application - peel strength testing and evaluation of biophysical skin response. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 148, [106168]. (doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106168).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: medical adhesives are commonly used for securing wound dressings and medical devices used for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes. Mechanical irritation of skin due to adhesive stripping and repeated application can lead to discomfort and device removal. This study aims to examine the peel strength and skin response to different medical adhesives in a cohort of healthy volunteers.

Method: twelve healthy participants were recruited for peel strength testing of three candidate adhesive tapes, and evaluation of the skin response after adhesive removal. A modified ASTM D903 peel strength testing was performed at 180° peeling angle and a rate of 300 mm/min on the forehead, upper back and forearm skin. A longitudinal study was conducted on the forearm and back, with the adhesive samples left in-situ for up to 60 h for analysis of repeat application. The effects of two skin preparation approaches (water and alcohol cleaning) prior to adhesive application were also assessed. Skin biophysical properties were assessed at baseline and at various timepoints following adhesive removal using transepidermal water loss (TEWL), erythema and hydration.

Results: peel strength reduced uniformly with repeat application over prolonged periods for all the adhesive samples tested. Skin preparation with water and alcohol cleansing prior to adhesive application increased peel strength at both the back (1.1% and 2.9%), and forearm (21.3% and 20%) sites. There was statistically significant increase from baseline to post-tape application for TEWL, skin redness and hydration (p < 0.001). However, there were no statistically significant differences between adhesive types (TEWL: p = 0.38, SR: p = 0.53, HY: p = 0.46). TEWL increased the most post-adhesion across all test sites and adhesive samples with repeat application (p < 0.05). Two-way ANOVA tests revealed no statistically significant interactions between the effects of application duration and adhesive on skin redness or TEWL for both the back and forearm sites (p > 0.05), though a significant interaction was indicted for hydration at the back site (p = 0.01).

Conclusion: this study revealed that site and duration of adhesive application effected peel strength. The corresponding changes in skin properties identified that skin barrier function was disrupted with long-term application of adhesives. The back site was identified to be most reliable for adhesion testing and skin response assessment for future work.

Text
Adhesives paper_R1_CLEAN - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (6MB)
Text
eSupplemental file - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (86kB)
Text
e070864.full - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (686kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 6 October 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 7 October 2023
Published date: 15 October 2023
Additional Information: Funding Information: This work was supported by Philips Sleep and Respiratory Care Ltd.
Keywords: Medical adhesives, Peel strength, Repeat application, Skin preparation, Skin response

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 483464
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/483464
ISSN: 1751-6161
PURE UUID: 6f0dc5ec-0969-44d4-9271-bc84e818adab
ORCID for Florence Mbithi: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6103-7996
ORCID for Peter R. Worsley: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0145-5042

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 31 Oct 2023 17:43
Last modified: 24 Apr 2024 02:03

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×