The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Demystifying authenticity: behavioral and neurophysiological signatures of self-positivity for authentic and presented selves

Demystifying authenticity: behavioral and neurophysiological signatures of self-positivity for authentic and presented selves
Demystifying authenticity: behavioral and neurophysiological signatures of self-positivity for authentic and presented selves
Authenticity has captivated scholars. But what is it? An emerging view considers it exaggerated favorability (self-enhancement), whereas traditional views regard it as self-accuracy and self-consistency. We tested these theoretical views by contrasting the authentic self with the presented self, a highly desirable representation. Behaviorally, participants ascribed less positivity to the authentic self: They endorsed more negative traits and were faster to admit having them; also, they endorsed fewer positive traits and were slower to admit having them. Neurally, participants manifested preferential processing of threatening information (P1), followed by preferential processing of favorable information (N170), about the presented self (than authentic self), indicating its brittleness. At a later stage (LPP), participants engaged in more elaborate processing of threatening and favorable information about the authentic self, indicating its subjective importance. Authenticity, albeit mostly positive, allows room for negativity.
authentic self, authenticity, neuroscience of authenticity, presented self, self-reference valence task, Authenticity, Self-reference valence task, Presented self, Authentic self, Neuroscience of authenticity
1053-8119
Huang, Chengli
d0388b89-23fd-4e0d-abbe-36a8c100d2b9
Sedikides, Constantine
9d45e66d-75bb-44de-87d7-21fd553812c2
Angus, Douglas J.
91f790ec-5741-4c83-9b6b-5f717f02ee84
Davis, William E.
e05532aa-b2c5-4e22-9613-0fa435053adf
Butterworth, James W.
d1ea9f02-21cd-4edd-a88d-1ccb46c201ec
Jeffers, Alexiss
266cd1f9-a5f7-481c-a092-0fcaf205c9ad
Schlegel, Rebecca
b90c8ed2-dfa9-419c-a6a0-4052a5e96005
Kelley, Nicholas
445e767b-ad9f-44f2-b2c6-d981482bb90b
Huang, Chengli
d0388b89-23fd-4e0d-abbe-36a8c100d2b9
Sedikides, Constantine
9d45e66d-75bb-44de-87d7-21fd553812c2
Angus, Douglas J.
91f790ec-5741-4c83-9b6b-5f717f02ee84
Davis, William E.
e05532aa-b2c5-4e22-9613-0fa435053adf
Butterworth, James W.
d1ea9f02-21cd-4edd-a88d-1ccb46c201ec
Jeffers, Alexiss
266cd1f9-a5f7-481c-a092-0fcaf205c9ad
Schlegel, Rebecca
b90c8ed2-dfa9-419c-a6a0-4052a5e96005
Kelley, Nicholas
445e767b-ad9f-44f2-b2c6-d981482bb90b

Huang, Chengli, Sedikides, Constantine, Angus, Douglas J., Davis, William E., Butterworth, James W., Jeffers, Alexiss, Schlegel, Rebecca and Kelley, Nicholas (2025) Demystifying authenticity: behavioral and neurophysiological signatures of self-positivity for authentic and presented selves. NeuroImage, 307, [121046]. (doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121046).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Authenticity has captivated scholars. But what is it? An emerging view considers it exaggerated favorability (self-enhancement), whereas traditional views regard it as self-accuracy and self-consistency. We tested these theoretical views by contrasting the authentic self with the presented self, a highly desirable representation. Behaviorally, participants ascribed less positivity to the authentic self: They endorsed more negative traits and were faster to admit having them; also, they endorsed fewer positive traits and were slower to admit having them. Neurally, participants manifested preferential processing of threatening information (P1), followed by preferential processing of favorable information (N170), about the presented self (than authentic self), indicating its brittleness. At a later stage (LPP), participants engaged in more elaborate processing of threatening and favorable information about the authentic self, indicating its subjective importance. Authenticity, albeit mostly positive, allows room for negativity.

Text
Huang et al., 2025_Manuscript - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (8MB)
Text
1-s2.0-S1053811925000485-main - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (7MB)
Text
Huang et al., 2005_Supplementary Material
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (616kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 22 January 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 23 January 2025
Published date: 4 February 2025
Keywords: authentic self, authenticity, neuroscience of authenticity, presented self, self-reference valence task, Authenticity, Self-reference valence task, Presented self, Authentic self, Neuroscience of authenticity

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 498699
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/498699
ISSN: 1053-8119
PURE UUID: 248c2735-7933-4e42-9b94-ba45d46c88c9
ORCID for Constantine Sedikides: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4036-889X
ORCID for Nicholas Kelley: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2256-0597

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 25 Feb 2025 18:02
Last modified: 15 May 2025 02:00

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Chengli Huang
Author: Douglas J. Angus
Author: William E. Davis
Author: Alexiss Jeffers
Author: Rebecca Schlegel
Author: Nicholas Kelley ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×