The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Medicine optimisation and deprescribing intervention outcomes for older people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review

Medicine optimisation and deprescribing intervention outcomes for older people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review
Medicine optimisation and deprescribing intervention outcomes for older people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy is common amongst older people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI), increasing the risk of medication-related harm. Medicine optimisation and deprescribing to reduce polypharmacy is considered feasible, safe and can lead to improved health. However, for those living with dementia or MCI, this can be challenging. This systematic review aimed to summarise the evidence on the outcomes of medicine optimisation and deprescribing interventions for older people with dementia or MCI.

METHODS: Literature was searched using CINAHL, Embase, Medline, PsychINFO, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library from database inception to January 2024. Papers reporting data specific to people with dementia or MCI from medicine optimisation and deprescribing interventional research studies of any design and in any setting were included. A narrative synthesis was conducted owing to heterogeneity of study designs and outcomes. Quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

RESULTS: A total of 32 papers reporting on 28 studies were included, with samples ranging from 29 to 17,933 patients and a mean patient age ranging from 74 to 88 years. Of the studies, 60% were undertaken in long-term care settings. Involvement of patients and/or carers in interventions was limited. Papers were grouped as either incorporating a medication review component (n = 13), education component (n = 5) or both (n = 14). Studies primarily focussed on medication-related outcomes, generally showing a positive effect on decreasing the number and improving appropriateness of medications. Fewer papers reported clinical outcomes (behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia, falls, quality of life and cognition) with mixed findings. A reduction or no change in mortality or hospital attendance demonstrated safety of the interventions in the few papers reporting these outcomes. The quality of the evidence was mixed.

CONCLUSIONS: Medicine optimisation and deprescribing interventions generally reduced the number and increased the appropriateness of medications, and although less frequently reported, these interventions seemed to be safe and showed an absence of worsening of clinical outcomes. This review highlights a need for further research, particularly in people with dementia or MCI living at home, with more focus on clinical outcomes and a greater involvement of patients and informal carers.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: The protocol was published in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) [Ref: CRD42023398139].

1170-229X
Andrews, Nicola
b156d179-2451-4a03-8130-caa20a00b72d
Brooks, Cindy
8a2fcddf-44b1-4f74-a14f-d877dddf58bd
Board, Michele
53c6cc6e-3a1e-4639-9a45-698559cf3e14
Fraser, Simon
135884b6-8737-4e8a-a98c-5d803ac7a2dc
Latter, Sue
83f100a4-95ec-4f2e-99a5-186095de2f3b
Aplin, Kirsty
657c07f3-975f-4d51-968b-9723a80d1cf8
McCausland, Beth
32a3f962-f9f7-494b-acdb-b0dc867bf5fd
Radcliffe, Eloise
4bbec31f-dadd-4b7d-95c4-7d96a5ec8659
Amin, Jay
b91805fc-c9fe-4504-94c6-49189e512458
Lim, Rosemary
82a96d22-a205-4d78-8379-801c76bb2b10
van Leeuwen, Ellen
c2de311a-3a69-4375-9039-11f28b593062
Ibrahim, Kinda
54f027ad-0599-4dd4-bdbf-b9307841a294
Andrews, Nicola
b156d179-2451-4a03-8130-caa20a00b72d
Brooks, Cindy
8a2fcddf-44b1-4f74-a14f-d877dddf58bd
Board, Michele
53c6cc6e-3a1e-4639-9a45-698559cf3e14
Fraser, Simon
135884b6-8737-4e8a-a98c-5d803ac7a2dc
Latter, Sue
83f100a4-95ec-4f2e-99a5-186095de2f3b
Aplin, Kirsty
657c07f3-975f-4d51-968b-9723a80d1cf8
McCausland, Beth
32a3f962-f9f7-494b-acdb-b0dc867bf5fd
Radcliffe, Eloise
4bbec31f-dadd-4b7d-95c4-7d96a5ec8659
Amin, Jay
b91805fc-c9fe-4504-94c6-49189e512458
Lim, Rosemary
82a96d22-a205-4d78-8379-801c76bb2b10
van Leeuwen, Ellen
c2de311a-3a69-4375-9039-11f28b593062
Ibrahim, Kinda
54f027ad-0599-4dd4-bdbf-b9307841a294

Andrews, Nicola, Brooks, Cindy, Board, Michele, Fraser, Simon, Latter, Sue, Aplin, Kirsty, McCausland, Beth, Radcliffe, Eloise, Amin, Jay, Lim, Rosemary, van Leeuwen, Ellen and Ibrahim, Kinda (2025) Medicine optimisation and deprescribing intervention outcomes for older people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review. Drugs & Aging, [105021]. (doi:10.1007/s40266-025-01189-2).

Record type: Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy is common amongst older people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI), increasing the risk of medication-related harm. Medicine optimisation and deprescribing to reduce polypharmacy is considered feasible, safe and can lead to improved health. However, for those living with dementia or MCI, this can be challenging. This systematic review aimed to summarise the evidence on the outcomes of medicine optimisation and deprescribing interventions for older people with dementia or MCI.

METHODS: Literature was searched using CINAHL, Embase, Medline, PsychINFO, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library from database inception to January 2024. Papers reporting data specific to people with dementia or MCI from medicine optimisation and deprescribing interventional research studies of any design and in any setting were included. A narrative synthesis was conducted owing to heterogeneity of study designs and outcomes. Quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

RESULTS: A total of 32 papers reporting on 28 studies were included, with samples ranging from 29 to 17,933 patients and a mean patient age ranging from 74 to 88 years. Of the studies, 60% were undertaken in long-term care settings. Involvement of patients and/or carers in interventions was limited. Papers were grouped as either incorporating a medication review component (n = 13), education component (n = 5) or both (n = 14). Studies primarily focussed on medication-related outcomes, generally showing a positive effect on decreasing the number and improving appropriateness of medications. Fewer papers reported clinical outcomes (behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia, falls, quality of life and cognition) with mixed findings. A reduction or no change in mortality or hospital attendance demonstrated safety of the interventions in the few papers reporting these outcomes. The quality of the evidence was mixed.

CONCLUSIONS: Medicine optimisation and deprescribing interventions generally reduced the number and increased the appropriateness of medications, and although less frequently reported, these interventions seemed to be safe and showed an absence of worsening of clinical outcomes. This review highlights a need for further research, particularly in people with dementia or MCI living at home, with more focus on clinical outcomes and a greater involvement of patients and informal carers.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: The protocol was published in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) [Ref: CRD42023398139].

Text
Accepted manuscript - Medicine optimisation and deprescribing intervention outcomes for older people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review - Accepted Manuscript
Download (153kB)
Text
s40266-025-01189-2 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)
Text
Online Resource 1 - Search Strategy
Download (208kB)
Text
Online Resource 2 - Details of interventions
Download (199kB)
Text
Online Resource 3 - Outcomes Data
Download (272kB)
Text
Fig 1
Download (52kB)

Show all 6 downloads.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 4 February 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 11 March 2025
Additional Information: © 2025. The Author(s).

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 499265
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/499265
ISSN: 1170-229X
PURE UUID: 7c249298-3369-4eb7-924b-d56268ebc8d5
ORCID for Nicola Andrews: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2595-1825
ORCID for Cindy Brooks: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0022-2100
ORCID for Simon Fraser: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4172-4406
ORCID for Sue Latter: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0973-0512
ORCID for Jay Amin: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3792-0428
ORCID for Kinda Ibrahim: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5709-3867

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 13 Mar 2025 17:32
Last modified: 16 Apr 2025 02:07

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Nicola Andrews ORCID iD
Author: Cindy Brooks ORCID iD
Author: Michele Board
Author: Simon Fraser ORCID iD
Author: Sue Latter ORCID iD
Author: Kirsty Aplin
Author: Beth McCausland
Author: Jay Amin ORCID iD
Author: Rosemary Lim
Author: Ellen van Leeuwen
Author: Kinda Ibrahim ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×