Grasping new material densities

Abstract

When picking up objects, we prefer stable grips with minimal torque by seeking grasp points that straddle the object’s center of mass (CoM). For homogeneous objects, the CoM is at the geometric center (GC), computable from shape cues. However, everyday objects often include components of different materials and densities. In this case, the CoM depends on the object’s geometry and the components’ densities.
We asked how participants estimate the CoM of novel, two-part objects. Across 4 experiments, participants used a precision grip to lift cylindrical objects comprised of steel and PVC in varying proportions (steel 3 times denser than PVC). In all experiments, initial grasps were close to objects’ GCs; neither every-day experience (metals are denser than PVC) nor pre-exposure to the stimulus materials in isolation moved first grasps away from the GC. Within a few trials, however, grasps shifted towards the CoM, reducing but not eliminating torque. Learning transferred across the stimulus set, i.e., observers learnt the materials’ densities (or their ratio) rather than learning each object’s CoM. In addition, there was a stable ‘under-reaching’ bias towards the grasping hand.
An ‘inverted density’ stimulus set (PVC 3 x denser than steel) induced similarly fast learning, confirming that prior knowledge of materials has little effect on grasp point selection. When stimulus sets were covertly switched during an experiment, the unexpected force feedback caused even faster grasp adaptation.
Torque minimisation is a strong driver of grasp point adaptation, but there is a surprising lack of transfer following pre-exposure to relevant materials.

More information

Identifiers

ORCID for Wendy J. Adams: orcid.org/0000-0002-5832-1056

Catalogue record

Export record

Altmetrics