Incorporation of model accuracy in gravitational-wave Bayesian inference
Incorporation of model accuracy in gravitational-wave Bayesian inference
Inferring the properties of colliding black holes from gravitational wave observations is subject to systematic errors arising from modelling uncertainties. Although the accuracy of each model can be calculated through comparison to theoretical expectations from general relativity, Bayesian analyses are yet to incorporate this information. As such, a mixture model is typically used where results obtained with different gravitational wave models are combined with either equal weight or based on their relative Bayesian evidence. In this work we present a new method for incorporating the accuracy of several models into gravitational wave Bayesian analyses. By analysing simulated gravitational wave signals in zero noise, we show that our technique uses 30% less computational resources and more faithfully recovers the true parameters than existing techniques. We further apply our method to a real gravitational wave signal and, when assuming the binary black hole hypothesis, demonstrated that the source of GW191109_010717 has unequal component masses, with a 69% probability for the primary being above the maximum black hole mass from stellar collapse. We envisage that this method will become an essential tool for ground-based gravitational wave astronomy.
1256-1267
Hoy, Charlie
7d31ecfa-4847-4904-85f3-ed04ba4c6bc3
Akcay, Sarp
fa1e3ced-9bdf-41b0-b5b7-777f114d753d
Mac Uillium, Jake
33e608fc-e6ef-41bf-a390-96bf2cf53008
Thompson, Jonathan E.
9d28204d-0d18-45d7-925e-5fb111aa5908
August 2025
Hoy, Charlie
7d31ecfa-4847-4904-85f3-ed04ba4c6bc3
Akcay, Sarp
fa1e3ced-9bdf-41b0-b5b7-777f114d753d
Mac Uillium, Jake
33e608fc-e6ef-41bf-a390-96bf2cf53008
Thompson, Jonathan E.
9d28204d-0d18-45d7-925e-5fb111aa5908
Hoy, Charlie, Akcay, Sarp, Mac Uillium, Jake and Thompson, Jonathan E.
(2025)
Incorporation of model accuracy in gravitational-wave Bayesian inference.
Nature Astronomy, 9 (8), .
(doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02579-7).
Abstract
Inferring the properties of colliding black holes from gravitational wave observations is subject to systematic errors arising from modelling uncertainties. Although the accuracy of each model can be calculated through comparison to theoretical expectations from general relativity, Bayesian analyses are yet to incorporate this information. As such, a mixture model is typically used where results obtained with different gravitational wave models are combined with either equal weight or based on their relative Bayesian evidence. In this work we present a new method for incorporating the accuracy of several models into gravitational wave Bayesian analyses. By analysing simulated gravitational wave signals in zero noise, we show that our technique uses 30% less computational resources and more faithfully recovers the true parameters than existing techniques. We further apply our method to a real gravitational wave signal and, when assuming the binary black hole hypothesis, demonstrated that the source of GW191109_010717 has unequal component masses, with a 69% probability for the primary being above the maximum black hole mass from stellar collapse. We envisage that this method will become an essential tool for ground-based gravitational wave astronomy.
Text
incorporating_model_accuracy_into_bayesian_inference_v3
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
s41550-025-02579-7
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 12 May 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 15 July 2025
Published date: August 2025
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 502993
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/502993
ISSN: 2397-3366
PURE UUID: 6243fb51-b9fa-4dcf-a8ef-1f661eae19b8
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 15 Jul 2025 16:54
Last modified: 11 Sep 2025 03:42
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Charlie Hoy
Author:
Sarp Akcay
Author:
Jake Mac Uillium
Author:
Jonathan E. Thompson
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics