The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Advanced cardiogenic-shock team versus standard care in cardiogenic SHOCK: a single centre service evaluation project

Advanced cardiogenic-shock team versus standard care in cardiogenic SHOCK: a single centre service evaluation project
Advanced cardiogenic-shock team versus standard care in cardiogenic SHOCK: a single centre service evaluation project

Background: cardiogenic shock (CS) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI) carries high mortality. Early revascularisation improves survival, but the effect of structured multidisciplinary care on outcomes remains underexplored.

Methods and results: ACT-SHOCK is a service evaluation at a UK tertiary cardiac centre. Between May 2023 and May 2024, 82 patients with AMI-related CS requiring emergent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were identified using protocolised physiological criteria and managed by an Advanced Cardiogenic-Shock Team (ACT). The ACT comprised interventional cardiologists, intensivists, anaesthetists, critical care staff and cardiac physiologists, coordinating PCI and ongoing care. Outcomes were compared with 83 historical controls from the year preceding ACT roll-out, who received standard care without ACT activation. Primary endpoints were 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes included predictors of 30-day mortality.Within the ACT cohort, elevated lactate, critical care admission, invasive ventilation, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) Shock Stage E at first medical contact predicted 1-year mortality. Adjusted analyses showed ACT management was associated with lower 1-year mortality compared with standard care (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.92; p=0.026). Although 30-day mortality was lower in the ACT group, this did not reach statistical significance (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.29; p=0.26). Escalation from coronary care to critical care during the recovery phase occurred more promptly in the ACT group (9.7% vs 2.4%, p=0.09). At 24 hours, a smaller proportion of ACT patients remained in SCAI stages D/E compared with standard care (42% vs 48%; p=0.003).

Conclusions: implementation of physiological criteria to identify CS and activation of a multidisciplinary ACT in a UK tertiary centre was associated with earlier detection and improved 1-year survival in AMI-related CS. These pilot data support further study across multiple UK centres to inform national policy and standardise care pathways.

Aged, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction/complications, Patient Care Team/standards, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/mortality, Retrospective Studies, Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy, Survival Rate/trends, Treatment Outcome, United Kingdom/epidemiology, CARDIOGENIC SHOCK, Heart Failure, Acute Coronary Syndrome
2053-3624
Chandra Mohan, Nitin
457b20ad-c9df-4eae-aae4-8c9827fd0ff5
Govier, Matthew
5ad21860-5478-4d54-83d0-b8ac81c0fb44
Johnson, Thomas W.
2a846488-0cb9-48a5-b5c9-7d950666404c
Felekos, Ioannis
17694d7d-5d08-490e-ac91-c5f227be861a
Richards, Gavin
62beebee-63e5-4d04-a5d4-2040bb560f45
Curzen, Nick
70f3ea49-51b1-418f-8e56-8210aef1abf4
et al.
Chandra Mohan, Nitin
457b20ad-c9df-4eae-aae4-8c9827fd0ff5
Govier, Matthew
5ad21860-5478-4d54-83d0-b8ac81c0fb44
Johnson, Thomas W.
2a846488-0cb9-48a5-b5c9-7d950666404c
Felekos, Ioannis
17694d7d-5d08-490e-ac91-c5f227be861a
Richards, Gavin
62beebee-63e5-4d04-a5d4-2040bb560f45
Curzen, Nick
70f3ea49-51b1-418f-8e56-8210aef1abf4

Chandra Mohan, Nitin, Govier, Matthew, Johnson, Thomas W. and Curzen, Nick , et al. (2026) Advanced cardiogenic-shock team versus standard care in cardiogenic SHOCK: a single centre service evaluation project. Open Heart, 13 (1), [e003794]. (doi:10.1136/openhrt-2025-003794).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: cardiogenic shock (CS) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI) carries high mortality. Early revascularisation improves survival, but the effect of structured multidisciplinary care on outcomes remains underexplored.

Methods and results: ACT-SHOCK is a service evaluation at a UK tertiary cardiac centre. Between May 2023 and May 2024, 82 patients with AMI-related CS requiring emergent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were identified using protocolised physiological criteria and managed by an Advanced Cardiogenic-Shock Team (ACT). The ACT comprised interventional cardiologists, intensivists, anaesthetists, critical care staff and cardiac physiologists, coordinating PCI and ongoing care. Outcomes were compared with 83 historical controls from the year preceding ACT roll-out, who received standard care without ACT activation. Primary endpoints were 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes included predictors of 30-day mortality.Within the ACT cohort, elevated lactate, critical care admission, invasive ventilation, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) Shock Stage E at first medical contact predicted 1-year mortality. Adjusted analyses showed ACT management was associated with lower 1-year mortality compared with standard care (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.92; p=0.026). Although 30-day mortality was lower in the ACT group, this did not reach statistical significance (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.29; p=0.26). Escalation from coronary care to critical care during the recovery phase occurred more promptly in the ACT group (9.7% vs 2.4%, p=0.09). At 24 hours, a smaller proportion of ACT patients remained in SCAI stages D/E compared with standard care (42% vs 48%; p=0.003).

Conclusions: implementation of physiological criteria to identify CS and activation of a multidisciplinary ACT in a UK tertiary centre was associated with earlier detection and improved 1-year survival in AMI-related CS. These pilot data support further study across multiple UK centres to inform national policy and standardise care pathways.

Text
ACTSHOCK_clean2.0 - Accepted Manuscript
Download (64kB)
Text
ACTSHOCK_Figures - Accepted Manuscript
Download (807kB)
Text
e003794.full - Version of Record
Download (795kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 12 January 2026
e-pub ahead of print date: 23 January 2026
Keywords: Aged, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction/complications, Patient Care Team/standards, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/mortality, Retrospective Studies, Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy, Survival Rate/trends, Treatment Outcome, United Kingdom/epidemiology, CARDIOGENIC SHOCK, Heart Failure, Acute Coronary Syndrome

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 510017
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/510017
ISSN: 2053-3624
PURE UUID: 231e8259-eb38-4b83-867f-4f1a91c2d4ae
ORCID for Nick Curzen: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9651-7829

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 13 Mar 2026 17:46
Last modified: 14 Mar 2026 02:46

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Nitin Chandra Mohan
Author: Matthew Govier
Author: Thomas W. Johnson
Author: Ioannis Felekos
Author: Gavin Richards
Author: Nick Curzen ORCID iD
Corporate Author: et al.

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×