The influence of gender and ethnicity on facemasks and respiratory protective equipment fit – a systematic review and meta-analysis
The influence of gender and ethnicity on facemasks and respiratory protective equipment fit – a systematic review and meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION: Black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) people are disproportionately affected by COVID-19. Respiratory protective equipment (RPE) has conventionally been developed for a predominantly white male population that does not represent the healthcare workforce. The literature was reviewed to determine the protection offered to female and BAME users.
METHODS: Five databases were searched. Eligible studies related to respirator fit in the context of anthropometrics, gender and ethnicity. Meta-analysis was performed for gender-based anthropometric differences. A priori protocol registration was not performed.
RESULTS: 32 studies were included and anthropometric data was extracted from 15 studies. Meta-analysis revealed 14 anthropometric measurements were significantly smaller for females. Mean differences ranged from 0.37 mm to 22.05 mm. Gender-based anthropometric differences did not always translate to lower fit factor scores, with 12 studies reporting worse performance and fit for females and 10 reporting no gender effect. No studies provided disaggregate anthropometric data by ethnic group. Pass rates (PR) were low or moderate in 12 BAME or mixed-ethnicity cohorts. 14 studies reported associations between facial dimensions (FD) and respirator fit. Three comparative studies showed lower PR among selective BAME people. 18 studies reported RPE performance differed with model and design. Most studies did not prespecify inclusion/exclusion criteria. Small sample size and lack of justification or power calculations was a concern. Significant heterogeneity in study designs limited comparisons, particularly relating to respirator selection or availability and defining study outcomes relating to RPE performance.
CONCLUSION: The literature reports on largely Caucasian or single ethnic populations, and BAME people remain under-represented, limiting comparisons between ethnic groups. Facial anthropometrics vary between gender and likely between ethnicity, which may contribute to lower PR among females and ethnic minorities, particularly Asians. There is a need for studies including a broader spectrum of ethnicities and for consideration of female and BAME users during RPE development.
COVID-19, health policies and all other topics, prevention strategies, respiratory infections
Chopra, Jagrati
8e250921-24e8-4321-8ff1-dfede7ceb726
Abiakam, Nkemjika
26818cc2-758e-4fa2-b1c3-8fef0ae82c4a
Kim, Hansung
2c7c135c-f00b-4409-acb2-85b3a9e8225f
Metcalf, Cheryl
09a47264-8bd5-43bd-a93e-177992c22c72
Worsley, Peter
6d33aee3-ef43-468d-aef6-86d190de6756
Cheong, Ying
4efbba2a-3036-4dce-82f1-8b4017952c83
11 November 2021
Chopra, Jagrati
8e250921-24e8-4321-8ff1-dfede7ceb726
Abiakam, Nkemjika
26818cc2-758e-4fa2-b1c3-8fef0ae82c4a
Kim, Hansung
2c7c135c-f00b-4409-acb2-85b3a9e8225f
Metcalf, Cheryl
09a47264-8bd5-43bd-a93e-177992c22c72
Worsley, Peter
6d33aee3-ef43-468d-aef6-86d190de6756
Cheong, Ying
4efbba2a-3036-4dce-82f1-8b4017952c83
Chopra, Jagrati, Abiakam, Nkemjika, Kim, Hansung, Metcalf, Cheryl, Worsley, Peter and Cheong, Ying
(2021)
The influence of gender and ethnicity on facemasks and respiratory protective equipment fit – a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BMJ Global Health, 6 (11), [e005537].
(doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005537).
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) people are disproportionately affected by COVID-19. Respiratory protective equipment (RPE) has conventionally been developed for a predominantly white male population that does not represent the healthcare workforce. The literature was reviewed to determine the protection offered to female and BAME users.
METHODS: Five databases were searched. Eligible studies related to respirator fit in the context of anthropometrics, gender and ethnicity. Meta-analysis was performed for gender-based anthropometric differences. A priori protocol registration was not performed.
RESULTS: 32 studies were included and anthropometric data was extracted from 15 studies. Meta-analysis revealed 14 anthropometric measurements were significantly smaller for females. Mean differences ranged from 0.37 mm to 22.05 mm. Gender-based anthropometric differences did not always translate to lower fit factor scores, with 12 studies reporting worse performance and fit for females and 10 reporting no gender effect. No studies provided disaggregate anthropometric data by ethnic group. Pass rates (PR) were low or moderate in 12 BAME or mixed-ethnicity cohorts. 14 studies reported associations between facial dimensions (FD) and respirator fit. Three comparative studies showed lower PR among selective BAME people. 18 studies reported RPE performance differed with model and design. Most studies did not prespecify inclusion/exclusion criteria. Small sample size and lack of justification or power calculations was a concern. Significant heterogeneity in study designs limited comparisons, particularly relating to respirator selection or availability and defining study outcomes relating to RPE performance.
CONCLUSION: The literature reports on largely Caucasian or single ethnic populations, and BAME people remain under-represented, limiting comparisons between ethnic groups. Facial anthropometrics vary between gender and likely between ethnicity, which may contribute to lower PR among females and ethnic minorities, particularly Asians. There is a need for studies including a broader spectrum of ethnicities and for consideration of female and BAME users during RPE development.
Text
The influence of gender and ethnicity on facemasks and respiratory protective equipment fit – a systematic review and meta-analysis BMJ Global Health
- Author's Original
Text
Appendix 6 Association of variables and fit
- Author's Original
Text
Appendix 4 distribution of participant ethnicities
- Author's Original
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 12 September 2021
e-pub ahead of print date: 11 November 2021
Published date: 11 November 2021
Additional Information:
Funding This work was supported by the Wessex Academic Health Sciences Network and Southampton Faculty of Medicine Enterprise board. NA was supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska‐Curie grant agreement No. 811 965 (Project STINTS ‐ Skin Tissue Integrity under Shear). PW had funding support from the Engineering and Physical Research Council grant ‘A BioEngineering approach for the SAFE design and fitting of Respiratory Protective Equipment (BE-SAFE RPE)’ (EP/V045563/1). JC is an NIHR Academic Fellow.
Keywords:
COVID-19, health policies and all other topics, prevention strategies, respiratory infections
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 452747
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/452747
ISSN: 2059-7908
PURE UUID: 597ad71e-d241-4181-a327-c007f7099451
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 17 Dec 2021 18:17
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:01
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Jagrati Chopra
Author:
Nkemjika Abiakam
Author:
Hansung Kim
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics