The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

In-hospital outcomes of ad hoc versus planned PCI for unprotected left-main disease: an analysis of 8574 cases from British Cardiovascular Intervention Society database 2006-2018

In-hospital outcomes of ad hoc versus planned PCI for unprotected left-main disease: an analysis of 8574 cases from British Cardiovascular Intervention Society database 2006-2018
In-hospital outcomes of ad hoc versus planned PCI for unprotected left-main disease: an analysis of 8574 cases from British Cardiovascular Intervention Society database 2006-2018

Background: although data suggests ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) results in similar patient outcomes compared to planned PCI in nonselected patients, data for ad hoc unprotected left main stem PCI (uLMS-PCI) are lacking. 

Aim: to determine if in-hospital outcomes of uLMS-PCI vary by ad hoc versus planned basis. 

Methods: data were analyzed from all patients undergoing uLMS-PCI in the United Kingdom 2006–2018, and patients grouped into uLMS-PCI undertaken on an ad hoc or a planned basis. Patients who presented with ST-segment elevation, cardiogenic shock, or with an emergency PCI indication were excluded. 

Results: in total, 8574 uLMS-PCI procedures were undertaken with 2837 (33.1%) of procedures performed on an ad hoc basis. There was a lower likelihood of intervention for stable angina (28.8% vs. 53.8%, p < 0.001) and a higher rate of potent P2Y12 inhibitor use (16.4% vs. 12.1%, p < 0.001) in the ad hoc PCI group compared to the planned PCI group. Patients undergoing uLMS-PCI on an ad hoc basis tended to undergo less complex procedures. Acute procedural complications including slow flow (odds ratio [OR]: 1.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01–2.86), coronary dissection (OR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.12–1.77) and shock induction (OR: 2.80, 95% CI: 1.64–4.78) were more likely in the ad hoc PCI group. In-hospital death (OR: 1.65, 95% CI: 1.19–2.27) and in-hospital major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (OR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.13–1.98) occurred more frequently in the ad hoc group. In sensitivity analyses, these observations did not differ when several subgroups were separately examined. 

Conclusions: ad hoc PCI for uLMS disease is associated with adverse outcomes compared to planned PCI. These data should inform uLMS-PCI procedural planning.

ad hoc PCI, left main artery, national database, percutaneous coronary intervention
1522-1946
697-706
Kinnaird, Tim
f055a7ef-706b-4b90-9a3f-f113ce49b80c
Gallagher, Sean
b556eacf-8c69-41fc-9774-264645561974
Farooq, Vasim
2bfd9494-2b9e-46ac-80c7-1be7d132c92e
Protty, Majd B.
d3d02328-8f55-43bf-ba58-e6ddb219f181
Cranch, Hannah
0ae38008-94f9-4649-8870-8b4b4c85c87b
Devlin, Peader
0499d3cc-c565-4c25-b411-f2226e515435
Sharp, Andrew
4cf40657-34e3-41dc-9a61-6d03cc8a1410
Curzen, Nick
70f3ea49-51b1-418f-8e56-8210aef1abf4
Ludman, Peter
f7393c73-0048-42fd-83e2-871ebf91d542
Hildick‐Smith, David
f3a8229d-dff9-4ca3-80d8-446ba70d43ca
Johnson, Tom
5d0280a9-6b5a-4f50-b804-76f1c1c9afc6
Mamas, Mamas A.
949e8dc2-458d-4c9a-9665-ec1bef03fc22
Kinnaird, Tim
f055a7ef-706b-4b90-9a3f-f113ce49b80c
Gallagher, Sean
b556eacf-8c69-41fc-9774-264645561974
Farooq, Vasim
2bfd9494-2b9e-46ac-80c7-1be7d132c92e
Protty, Majd B.
d3d02328-8f55-43bf-ba58-e6ddb219f181
Cranch, Hannah
0ae38008-94f9-4649-8870-8b4b4c85c87b
Devlin, Peader
0499d3cc-c565-4c25-b411-f2226e515435
Sharp, Andrew
4cf40657-34e3-41dc-9a61-6d03cc8a1410
Curzen, Nick
70f3ea49-51b1-418f-8e56-8210aef1abf4
Ludman, Peter
f7393c73-0048-42fd-83e2-871ebf91d542
Hildick‐Smith, David
f3a8229d-dff9-4ca3-80d8-446ba70d43ca
Johnson, Tom
5d0280a9-6b5a-4f50-b804-76f1c1c9afc6
Mamas, Mamas A.
949e8dc2-458d-4c9a-9665-ec1bef03fc22

Kinnaird, Tim, Gallagher, Sean, Farooq, Vasim, Protty, Majd B., Cranch, Hannah, Devlin, Peader, Sharp, Andrew, Curzen, Nick, Ludman, Peter, Hildick‐Smith, David, Johnson, Tom and Mamas, Mamas A. (2024) In-hospital outcomes of ad hoc versus planned PCI for unprotected left-main disease: an analysis of 8574 cases from British Cardiovascular Intervention Society database 2006-2018. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 104 (4), 697-706. (doi:10.1002/ccd.31210).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: although data suggests ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) results in similar patient outcomes compared to planned PCI in nonselected patients, data for ad hoc unprotected left main stem PCI (uLMS-PCI) are lacking. 

Aim: to determine if in-hospital outcomes of uLMS-PCI vary by ad hoc versus planned basis. 

Methods: data were analyzed from all patients undergoing uLMS-PCI in the United Kingdom 2006–2018, and patients grouped into uLMS-PCI undertaken on an ad hoc or a planned basis. Patients who presented with ST-segment elevation, cardiogenic shock, or with an emergency PCI indication were excluded. 

Results: in total, 8574 uLMS-PCI procedures were undertaken with 2837 (33.1%) of procedures performed on an ad hoc basis. There was a lower likelihood of intervention for stable angina (28.8% vs. 53.8%, p < 0.001) and a higher rate of potent P2Y12 inhibitor use (16.4% vs. 12.1%, p < 0.001) in the ad hoc PCI group compared to the planned PCI group. Patients undergoing uLMS-PCI on an ad hoc basis tended to undergo less complex procedures. Acute procedural complications including slow flow (odds ratio [OR]: 1.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01–2.86), coronary dissection (OR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.12–1.77) and shock induction (OR: 2.80, 95% CI: 1.64–4.78) were more likely in the ad hoc PCI group. In-hospital death (OR: 1.65, 95% CI: 1.19–2.27) and in-hospital major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (OR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.13–1.98) occurred more frequently in the ad hoc group. In sensitivity analyses, these observations did not differ when several subgroups were separately examined. 

Conclusions: ad hoc PCI for uLMS disease is associated with adverse outcomes compared to planned PCI. These data should inform uLMS-PCI procedural planning.

Text
1Manuscript - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (59kB)
Slideshow
Figure 1 - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (56kB)
Slideshow
Figure 2 - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (276kB)
Slideshow
Figure 3 - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
Slideshow
Figure 4 - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
Slideshow
Figure 5 - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
Text
Supplementary Table 1 - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
Text
Table 1 - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
Text
Table 2 - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
Text
Table 3 - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
Text
Cathet Cardio Intervent - 2024 - Kinnaird - In‐hospital outcomes of ad hoc versus planned PCI for unprotected left‐main - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

Show all 11 downloads.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 19 August 2024
e-pub ahead of print date: 5 September 2024
Published date: 8 October 2024
Keywords: ad hoc PCI, left main artery, national database, percutaneous coronary intervention

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 494388
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/494388
ISSN: 1522-1946
PURE UUID: 4bfc98ff-e776-41bb-9753-ae3ce3dac757
ORCID for Nick Curzen: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9651-7829

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Oct 2024 17:07
Last modified: 08 Nov 2024 02:39

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Tim Kinnaird
Author: Sean Gallagher
Author: Vasim Farooq
Author: Majd B. Protty
Author: Hannah Cranch
Author: Peader Devlin
Author: Andrew Sharp
Author: Nick Curzen ORCID iD
Author: Peter Ludman
Author: David Hildick‐Smith
Author: Tom Johnson
Author: Mamas A. Mamas

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×